• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结外侵犯升级后口腔癌患者的 N 分类是否仍然必要?

Is the N Category Still Necessary for Oral Cancer Patients After Extranodal Extension Upgrade?

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4220-4230. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13434-2. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-023-13434-2
PMID:37071234
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The presence of single-node metastasis (Ns) sometimes could be encountered in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The survival outcome for different Ns should be worthy of discussion.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with OSCC at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2007 and December 2018 were reviewed. All patients with Ns were classified into two groups: with and without extranodal extension (ENE).

RESULTS

We analyzed 311 OSCC patients with Ns: 77 (24.76%) with and 234 (75.24%) without ENE. Lymph node (LN) >3 cm was the only significant factor associated with ENE (odds ratio 17.21, p < 0.001). The 5-year, disease-free survival of N/N and N patients was 60.5% and 49.4%, respectively (p = 0.04), and the 5-year overall survival was 63.1% and 33.6%, respectively (p = 0.0001). Four fifths of Ns patients with LN >3 cm were upgraded to N category as ENE+. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could provide significant benefit in regional control for Ns patients with (p = 0.03) and without (p = 0.0004) other adverse features. After multivariant Cox analysis, ENE+ was a modest and significant risk factor for disease-free (p = 0.08) and overall survival (p = 0.001). By contrast, the LN>3cm and N category were not significant risk factors for disease-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

For OSCC patients with Ns, the survival outcome between N category and N/N category was significantly different. After ENE+ upgrades (>80%), there were fewer N patients, and these patients became more comparable to N patients. PORT could significantly improve regional control for Ns patients.

摘要

背景

口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者有时会出现单节点转移(Ns)。不同 Ns 的生存结果值得讨论。

方法

回顾了 2007 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在国立台湾大学医院诊断为 OSCC 的患者。将所有 Ns 患者分为两组:有和没有结外扩展(ENE)。

结果

我们分析了 311 例 Ns 的 OSCC 患者:77 例(24.76%)有 ENE,234 例(75.24%)没有 ENE。淋巴结(LN)>3cm 是唯一与 ENE 相关的显著因素(优势比 17.21,p<0.001)。N/N 和 N 患者的 5 年无病生存率分别为 60.5%和 49.4%(p=0.04),5 年总生存率分别为 63.1%和 33.6%(p=0.0001)。四分之三的 LN>3cm 的 Ns 患者被升级为 ENE+的 N 类。术后放疗(PORT)可显著提高 Ns 患者的区域控制率(p=0.03)和无其他不良特征的 Ns 患者(p=0.0004)。多变量 Cox 分析后,ENE+是无病(p=0.08)和总生存(p=0.001)的适度显著危险因素。相比之下,LN>3cm 和 N 类不是无病和总生存的显著危险因素。

结论

对于 Ns 的 OSCC 患者,N 类和 N/N 类之间的生存结果有显著差异。在 ENE+升级(>80%)后,N 患者较少,这些患者与 N 患者更为可比。PORT 可显著提高 Ns 患者的区域控制率。

相似文献

1
Is the N Category Still Necessary for Oral Cancer Patients After Extranodal Extension Upgrade?结外侵犯升级后口腔癌患者的 N 分类是否仍然必要?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4220-4230. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13434-2. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
MMP14 expression levels accurately predict the presence of extranodal extensions in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.MMP14 表达水平能准确预测口腔鳞状细胞癌的结外侵犯:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Feb 10;23(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10595-x.
3
Macroscopic Extranodal Extension In Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Subgroup With Poor Survival.口腔鳞状细胞癌中巨观性结外侵犯-生存较差的亚群。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Mar;133(3):588-593. doi: 10.1002/lary.30158. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
Incidence and prognostic significance of extranodal extension in isolated nodal recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma.口腔鳞状细胞癌孤立淋巴结复发中外突对预后的影响及意义。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Feb;167:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
Extent of Extranodal Extension in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma is Not Independently Associated With Overall or Disease-Free Survival at a 2.0-mm Threshold.口腔鳞状细胞癌结外扩展范围在2.0毫米阈值时与总生存期或无病生存期无独立相关性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Dec;80(12):1978-1988. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.08.019. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
6
Development and validation of a novel TNM staging N-classification of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.开发和验证一种新型口腔鳞状细胞癌的 TNM 分期 N 分类。
Cancer. 2024 Feb 1;130(3):410-420. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35020. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Novel pathological predictive factors for extranodal extension in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study based on tumor budding, desmoplastic reaction, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and depth of invasion.口腔鳞状细胞癌中结外侵犯的新型病理预测因素:基于肿瘤芽生、纤维反应、肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞和浸润深度的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09393-8.
8
Is the addition of extranodal extension and lymph node yield of pN0 to the lymph node ratio useful as a prognostic parameter for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma?结外侵犯和 pN0 淋巴结检出量对口腔鳞状细胞癌患者的淋巴结比率作为预后参数是否有用?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Oct;59(8):941-946. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
The Potential Impact and Usability of the Eighth Edition TNM Staging Classification in Oral Cavity Cancer.第八版 TNM 分期分类在口腔癌中的潜在影响和可用性。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Oct;33(10):e442-e449. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
10
Pathological risk factors stratification in pN3b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Focus on the number of positive nodes and extranodal extension.口腔鳞状细胞癌 pN3b 患者的病理危险因素分层:重点关注阳性淋巴结数量和淋巴结外侵犯。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Nov;86:188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of invasion into cervical esophagus for patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.下咽鳞癌侵犯食管颈段对患者的影响。
Oral Oncol. 2022 Feb;125:105683. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105683. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Adequate surgical margins for oral cancer: A Taiwan cancer registry national database analysis.口腔癌的充分手术切缘:台湾癌症登记全国数据库分析。
Oral Oncol. 2021 Aug;119:105358. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105358. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
Lymph node characteristics and their prognostic significance in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
口腔鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结特征及其预后意义。
Head Neck. 2021 Feb;43(2):520-533. doi: 10.1002/hed.26499. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Use of Propensity Score Methodology in Contemporary High-Impact Surgical Literature.应用倾向评分法于当代高影响力外科文献中。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jan;230(1):101-112.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
5
Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌颈部管理:ASCO 临床实践指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 10;37(20):1753-1774. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01921. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
Metastatic Lymph Node Burden and Survival in Oral Cavity Cancer.口腔癌中转移性淋巴结负荷与生存情况
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;35(31):3601-3609. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.1176. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
7
Elective versus Therapeutic Neck Dissection in Node-Negative Oral Cancer.择期性与治疗性颈清扫术在淋巴结阴性口腔癌中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):521-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506007. Epub 2015 May 31.
8
Comparison of the American Joint Committee on Cancer N1 versus N2a nodal categories for predicting survival and recurrence in patients with oral cancer: Time to acknowledge an arbitrary distinction and modify the system.美国癌症联合委员会N1与N2a淋巴结分类在预测口腔癌患者生存和复发方面的比较:是时候承认这种任意区分并修改该系统了。
Head Neck. 2016 Jan;38(1):135-9. doi: 10.1002/hed.23871. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
9
The clinical predictive factors for subsequent distant metastasis in patients with locoregionally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期口腔鳞状细胞癌患者发生远处转移的临床预测因素。
Oral Oncol. 2013 Apr;49(4):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
10
Histological assessment of cervical lymph node identifies patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): who would benefit from chemoradiation after surgery?对颈淋巴结的组织学评估可识别头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者:术后哪些患者将从放化疗中获益?
Laryngoscope. 2012 Dec;122(12):2712-22. doi: 10.1002/lary.23572. Epub 2012 Oct 11.