Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Japan Institute of Sports Sciences, Nishigaoka, Kita-ku, Tokyo.
J Athl Train. 2023 Nov 1;58(11-12):920-926. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0592.22.
Individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) exhibit altered movement strategies during side-cutting tasks. However, no researchers have assessed how altered movement strategies affect cutting performance.
To investigate compensatory strategies in the side-hop test (SHT), with a focus on the entire lower extremity, among individuals with CAI.
Cross-sectional study.
Laboratory.
A total of 40 male soccer players comprising a CAI group (n = 20; age = 20.35 ± 1.15 years, height = 173.95 ± 6.07 cm, mass = 68.09 ± 6.73 kg) and a control group (n = 20; age = 20.45 ± 1.50 years, height = 172.39 ± 4.39 cm, mass = 67.16 ± 4.87 kg).
INTERVENTION(S): Participants performed 3 successful SHT trials.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We calculated SHT time, torque, and torque power in the ankle, knee, and hip joints during the SHT using motion-capture cameras and force plates. Confidence intervals for each group that did not overlap by >3 points consecutively in the time series data indicated a difference between groups.
Compared with the control group, the CAI group showed (1) no delayed SHT time; (2) lower ankle-inversion torque (range = 0.11-0.13 N·m/kg) and higher hip-extension (range = 0.18-0.72 N·m/kg) and -abduction torque (0.26 N·m/kg); (3) less concentric power in ankle dorsiflexion-plantar flexion (0.18 W/kg) and inversion-eversion (0.40 W/kg), more concentric power in hip flexion-extension (0.73 W/kg), and more eccentric power in knee varus-valgus (0.27 W/kg).
Individuals with CAI were likely to rely on hip-joint function to compensate for ankle instability and demonstrated no differences in SHT time compared with the control group. Therefore, the movement strategies of individuals with CAI could differ from those of individuals without CAI, even if SHT time is not different.
慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)患者在进行侧方切割任务时表现出运动策略的改变。然而,尚无研究评估运动策略的改变如何影响切割性能。
探讨 CAI 患者在侧跳测试(SHT)中整个下肢的代偿策略。
横断面研究。
实验室。
共纳入 40 名男性足球运动员,包括 CAI 组(n = 20;年龄 = 20.35 ± 1.15 岁,身高 = 173.95 ± 6.07cm,体重 = 68.09 ± 6.73kg)和对照组(n = 20;年龄 = 20.45 ± 1.50 岁,身高 = 172.39 ± 4.39cm,体重 = 67.16 ± 4.87kg)。
参与者进行了 3 次成功的 SHT 试验。
使用运动捕捉摄像机和力板,在 SHT 期间计算踝关节、膝关节和髋关节的 SHT 时间、扭矩和扭矩功率。如果组间连续 3 次时间序列数据的置信区间不重叠>3 点,则表明组间存在差异。
与对照组相比,CAI 组(1)SHT 时间无延迟;(2)踝关节内翻扭矩较低(范围=0.11-0.13 N·m/kg),髋关节伸展(范围=0.18-0.72 N·m/kg)和外展扭矩较高(0.26 N·m/kg);(3)踝关节背屈-跖屈(0.18 W/kg)和内翻-外翻(0.40 W/kg)的向心功率较小,髋关节屈伸(0.73 W/kg)的向心功率较大,膝关节内翻-外翻(0.27 W/kg)的离心功率较大。
CAI 患者可能依赖髋关节功能来代偿踝关节不稳定,与对照组相比,SHT 时间无差异。因此,即使 SHT 时间没有差异,CAI 患者的运动策略也可能与无 CAI 患者不同。