Gastroenterology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, .
Gastroenterology, v, .
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2023 Sep;115(9):496-503. doi: 10.17235/reed.2023.9422/2022.
endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is effective for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) with small hiatus hernia. However, evidence of its applicability in patients with larger hernia sac is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ARMS for patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia (3-5 cm) and determine the appropriate resection range.
thirty-six patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia were enrolled. They were divided into 2/3 and 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection groups. The patients received modified ARMS. The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) and DeMeester scores, endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring results and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure were compared pre- and post-procedure. Therapeutic effects and complications of the two mucosal resection ranges were analyzed.
thirty-six patients were enrolled in this study, all of whom had undergone ARMS surgery with at least six-month follow-up. In the 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group, the GERD-Q score, acid exposure time (AET) and DeMeester score improved significantly compared with those before surgery (p < 0.001). In the 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group, the GERD-Q score, AET and DeMeeter score worsened after six months (p < 0.001), but there was no difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). In both groups, there was no significant improvement in the ratio of esophagitis grade C/D and LES resting pressure after treatment compared with the baseline values (p > 0.05), and no postoperative bleeding or perforation was observed. The incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis in the 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group was lower than that in the 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group (p = 0.041).
modified ARMS is effective for patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia, but it cannot significantly increase the postoperative resting pressure of the LES. The 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection can reduce the incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis.
内镜下抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)对小裂孔疝的难治性胃食管反流病(rGERD)患者有效。然而,其在疝囊较大的患者中应用的证据尚缺乏。本研究旨在评估 ARMS 治疗中等裂孔疝(3-5cm)rGERD 患者的疗效和安全性,并确定合适的切除范围。
纳入 36 例中等裂孔疝 rGERD 患者,分为 2/3 环周黏膜切除术组和 3/4 环周黏膜切除术组,均行改良 ARMS 术。比较术前、术后胃食管反流病问卷(GERD-Q)评分、DeMeester 评分、内镜检查、24 h pH 监测结果和食管下括约肌(LES)静息压。分析两种环周黏膜切除范围的治疗效果和并发症。
36 例患者均完成 ARMS 手术,且均获得至少 6 个月随访。2/3 环周黏膜切除术组 GERD-Q 评分、酸暴露时间(AET)和 DeMeester 评分较术前明显改善(p<0.001);3/4 环周黏膜切除术组术后 6 个月 GERD-Q 评分、AET 和 DeMeester 评分较术前恶化(p<0.001),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两组治疗后食管炎 C/D 级比例和 LES 静息压与基线值比较差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05),均未发生术后出血和穿孔。2/3 环周黏膜切除术组术后食管狭窄发生率低于 3/4 环周黏膜切除术组(p=0.041)。
改良 ARMS 对中等裂孔疝 rGERD 患者有效,但不能明显增加术后 LES 静息压。2/3 环周黏膜切除术可降低术后食管狭窄发生率。