病毒学与大流行的理性思辨

Rational Discourse on Virology and Pandemics.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

mBio. 2023 Jun 27;14(3):e0031323. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00313-23. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

Abstract

A group of 156 virologists, including American Society of Microbiology journal editors-in-chief, has recently published across three ASM journals a "call for rational discourse" on such important topics as the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and gain of function research (e.g., F. Goodrum et al., 14:e0018823, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00188-23). Here, I answer the call, arguing that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is unknown; that continued premature downplaying of a possible laboratory origin, now accompanied by a denial that this was ever so dismissed, undermines public trust in science; and that the benefits from risky gain-of-function research-of-concern are fewer than Goodrum et al. imply.

摘要

一组 156 位病毒学家,包括美国微生物学会期刊主编,最近在三个 ASM 期刊上发表了一篇“呼吁理性讨论”的文章,讨论了一些重要的话题,如 SARS-CoV-2 的起源和功能获得研究(例如,F. Goodrum 等人,2023 年,https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00188-23)。在这里,我响应这一号召,认为 SARS-CoV-2 的起源尚不清楚;继续过早地淡化实验室起源的可能性,现在伴随着否认曾经有过这种说法,破坏了公众对科学的信任;而且,风险收益比从令人担忧的功能获得研究中获益比 Goodrum 等人所暗示的要少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c227/10294648/aabbb814b1f7/mbio.00313-23-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索