Kumar Mohal, Pankaj Deepak, Kumar Nitesh, Abhishek K, Bhushan Vibhuti, Tajdar Yasir, Kumari Pooja, Muni Sweta
General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Microbiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 17;15(3):e36304. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36304. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Introduction Hemorrhoids are basically anal cushions which turn out to be pathological giving rise to bleeding, pain and protrusion outside the anal canal. The chief complaint of patients with hemorrhoids is bleeding from the rectum which is usually painless and associated with episodes of defecation. The study was done to assess postoperative pain, time duration of the procedure, complications in the postoperative period, return to normal work, and recurrence between the stapler and open hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids. Material and methods The present prospective study was conducted among 60 patients in the General Surgery department at Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), Patna, Bihar over the duration of two years presenting with grade III and IV degree hemorrhoids. Thirty patients each were divided into open hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidectomy groups. The study evaluated variables like operative time, stay at the hospital and postoperative complications and compared them between the two techniques. Follow-up of patients was done at regular intervals. Evaluation of postoperative pain was done using visual analogue scale (VAS) with ranges from 0 to 10. We evaluated the data using the chi-square test with a p-value <0.05 as significant. Results Of 60 patients, 47 (78.3%) were males and 13 (21.7%) were females with a male: female ratio being 3.6:1. The operating time and hospital stay were much less in the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group as compared to the open procedure group. Also, postoperative pain (visual analogue scale) was less in the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group with 36.7% of patients presenting with pain at one week, 23.3% at one month and 3.3% at three months in the open hemorrhoidectomy group whereas 13.3% presenting as pain in one week, 10% presenting at one month and none presenting at three months in the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group. There was recurrence seen in 10% of cases at three months in the open hemorrhoidectomy group as compared to the stapler hemorrhoidectomy group where no recurrence was found at three months follow-up. Conclusion Hemorrhoid offers a variety of surgical modalities of treatment. We have come to the conclusion that stapled hemorrhoidectomy has less complications and good patient compliance. It can be an effective option in the treatment of third and fourth-grade hemorrhoids. With proper training and expertise, stapler hemorrhoidectomy is a better and reliable technique for hemorrhoid surgery.
引言
痔疮本质上是肛管垫,当其发生病理性改变时,会导致出血、疼痛和肛管外脱垂。痔疮患者的主要症状是直肠出血,通常无痛,且与排便有关。本研究旨在评估吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与开放式痔切除术治疗Ⅲ度和Ⅳ度痔疮的术后疼痛、手术时长、术后并发症、恢复正常工作的情况以及复发率。
材料与方法
本前瞻性研究在比哈尔邦巴特那市英迪拉·甘地医学科学研究所(IGIMS)普通外科对60例Ⅲ度和Ⅳ度痔疮患者进行,为期两年。将30例患者分为开放式痔切除术组和吻合器痔上黏膜环切术组。本研究评估了手术时间、住院时间和术后并发症等变量,并对两种技术进行比较。定期对患者进行随访。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS,范围为0至10)评估术后疼痛。我们使用卡方检验评估数据,p值<0.05为有统计学意义。
结果
60例患者中,47例(78.3%)为男性,13例(21.7%)为女性,男女比例为3.6:1。与开放式手术组相比,吻合器痔上黏膜环切术组的手术时间和住院时间要短得多。此外,吻合器痔上黏膜环切术组的术后疼痛(视觉模拟评分)较轻,开放式痔切除术组在术后一周有疼痛的患者占36.7%,术后一个月占23.3%,术后三个月占3.3%;而吻合器痔上黏膜环切术组在术后一周有疼痛的患者占13.3%,术后一个月占10%,术后三个月无疼痛患者。开放式痔切除术组在术后三个月有10%的病例出现复发,而吻合器痔上黏膜环切术组在三个月随访时未发现复发。
结论
痔疮有多种手术治疗方式。我们得出的结论是,吻合器痔上黏膜环切术并发症较少,患者依从性良好。它可以作为治疗Ⅲ度和Ⅳ度痔疮的有效选择。经过适当培训并具备专业技能后,吻合器痔上黏膜环切术是一种更好且可靠的痔疮手术技术。