Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231169881. doi: 10.1177/15330338231169881.
Aspirations without a tissue core are common in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration procedures. However, the diagnostic value of all-shot aspirations and no-tissue-core aspirations is unclear. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with the description of all-shot or no-tissue-core aspirations was conducted at a tertiary hospital between January 2017 and March 2021. Patients' pathologic and clinical diagnoses were retrieved and compared between all-shot patients (all aspirations had a tissue core) and no-tissue-core patients (at least one aspiration had no tissue core). Among all 505 patients with 1402 aspirations, 356 (70.5%) patients, and 1184 (84.5%) aspirations were all-shot. Pathologic diagnosis after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration revealed neoplasms in 46.1% of all-shot patients, but 33.6% of no-tissue-core patients (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.52; = .009). Final clinical diagnosis revealed malignancy in 53.1% of all-shot patients, but 37.6% of no-tissue-core patients (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.78; = .001). In 133 patients with pathologic nonspecific findings, a clinical diagnosis of malignancy was proven in 25 of 79 (31.6%) of all-shot patients, but only 6 of 54 (11.1%) of no-tissue-core patients (odds ratio, 3.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-9.79; = .006). Patients with all-shot aspirations in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration are more likely to have the pathologic and clinical diagnosis of malignancy. More measures should be taken to exclude malignancy in all-shot patients when the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration was nondiagnostic.
经支气管超声内镜引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)中常出现无组织芯的抽吸。但全抽吸和无组织芯抽吸的诊断价值尚不清楚。本研究回顾性分析了 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月在一家三级医院接受 EBUS-TBNA 检查的患者,描述了全抽吸和无组织芯抽吸的情况。检索了患者的病理和临床诊断,并比较了全抽吸组(所有抽吸均有组织芯)和无组织芯组(至少一次抽吸无组织芯)患者的病理和临床诊断。在 505 例 1402 次抽吸的患者中,356 例(70.5%)和 1184 次(84.5%)为全抽吸。EBUS-TBNA 后病理诊断显示,全抽吸组中肿瘤占 46.1%,但无组织芯组中仅占 33.6%(比值比 1.69;95%置信区间 1.14-2.52; = .009)。最终临床诊断显示,全抽吸组中恶性肿瘤占 53.1%,无组织芯组中仅占 37.6%(比值比 1.88;95%置信区间 1.27-2.78; = .001)。在 133 例病理无特异性发现的患者中,79 例全抽吸患者中有 25 例(31.6%)临床诊断为恶性肿瘤,而 54 例无组织芯抽吸患者中仅有 6 例(11.1%)(比值比 3.70;95%置信区间 1.40-9.79; = .006)。在 EBUS-TBNA 中,全抽吸的患者更有可能被诊断为恶性肿瘤。当 EBUS-TBNA 诊断不明确时,应采取更多措施排除全抽吸患者的恶性肿瘤。