• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

融合靶向活检显著提高了初次活检的前列腺癌检出率。

Fusion-targeted biopsy significantly improves prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve men.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2023 Jul;30(7):600-604. doi: 10.1111/iju.15188. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1111/iju.15188
PMID:37078488
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The precise diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) is crucial to avoid underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment. We aimed to compare clinically significant PC (csPC) detection between MRI/ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate (TBx) compared to systematic biopsy (SBx) in biopsy-naïve Japanese men.

METHODS

We included patients with suspect PC due to elevated PSA level or abnormal digital rectal examination, or both. csPC was defined as International Society Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group ≥2 (csPC-A) and ISUP grade group ≥3 (csPC-B).

RESULTS

This study included 143 patients. Overall PC detection was 66.4% for SBx and 67.8% for MRI-TBx. MRI-TBx presented a significantly higher rate of csPC detection (csPC-A 67.1% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.04, and csPC-B 49.6% vs. 39.9%, p < 0.001) and significantly lower detection of non-csPC-A (0.6% vs. 6.7%). Importantly, MRI-TBx missed 4.9% (7/143) of csPC-A and only 0.7% (1/143) of csPC-B. On the other hand, SBx alone missed 13.3% (19/143) of csPC-A and 4.2% (6/143) of csPC-B.

CONCLUSION

MRI-TBx significantly outperformed 12-cores SBx for csPC detection and decreased non-csPC detection in biopsy-naive men. Performing MRI-TBx without SBx would have missed some csPC, supporting that MRI-TBx synergizes with SBx to increase csPC detection.

摘要

目的

前列腺癌(PC)的精确诊断对于避免漏诊、过度诊断和过度治疗至关重要。我们旨在比较 MRI/超声融合靶向前列腺(TBx)与系统活检(SBx)在初次活检的日本男性中对临床显著 PC(csPC)的检测效果。

方法

我们纳入了因 PSA 水平升高或直肠指检异常或两者兼有的疑似 PC 患者。csPC 定义为国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级组≥2(csPC-A)和 ISUP 分级组≥3(csPC-B)。

结果

本研究共纳入 143 例患者。SBx 总体 PC 检出率为 66.4%,MRI-TBx 为 67.8%。MRI-TBx 检测 csPC 的阳性率显著更高(csPC-A 为 67.1% vs. 58.7%,p=0.04,csPC-B 为 49.6% vs. 39.9%,p<0.001),而非 csPC-A 的检出率显著更低(0.6% vs. 6.7%)。重要的是,MRI-TBx 漏诊了 4.9%(7/143)的 csPC-A 和仅 0.7%(1/143)的 csPC-B。另一方面,SBx 单独漏诊了 13.3%(19/143)的 csPC-A 和 4.2%(6/143)的 csPC-B。

结论

MRI-TBx 显著提高了初次活检男性中 csPC 的检测率,降低了非 csPC 的检出率。不进行 SBx 而单独进行 MRI-TBx 可能会漏诊一些 csPC,支持 MRI-TBx 与 SBx 联合使用以提高 csPC 的检出率。

相似文献

1
Fusion-targeted biopsy significantly improves prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve men.融合靶向活检显著提高了初次活检的前列腺癌检出率。
Int J Urol. 2023 Jul;30(7):600-604. doi: 10.1111/iju.15188. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.评价经会阴 MRI/超声融合前列腺活检术诊断单个单侧可疑 MRI 异常的男性患者的最佳策略。
Prostate. 2023 Sep;83(13):1255-1262. doi: 10.1002/pros.24585. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
3
Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.利用前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分选择最佳前列腺活检方法:Trio 研究的二次分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;5(2):176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
4
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE).磁共振成像靶向与系统前列腺活检:一项前瞻性随机试验(PRECISE)的 2 年随访结果。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):456-461. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
5
Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.多参数磁共振成像异常的男性患者接受磁共振成像-经直肠超声融合前列腺活检的最佳采样方案
Urol Oncol. 2019 Jan;37(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?在主动监测的男性中,通过连续前列腺磁共振成像和重复活检进行前列腺癌升级:是否仍需要确认性活检?
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):124-132. doi: 10.1111/bju.15065. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.经会阴模板引导式饱和与靶向前列腺活检的男性前列腺癌检出率。
Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):388-396. doi: 10.1002/pros.24286. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
Adding systematic biopsy to magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in men with previous negative biopsy or enrolled in active surveillance programs: A prospective single center, randomized study.在既往活检结果为阴性或参加主动监测项目的男性中,在磁共振超声融合靶向前列腺活检基础上增加系统活检:一项前瞻性单中心随机研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 11;99(37):e22059. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022059.
9
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.在未经前列腺活检的患者中进行前列腺癌风险评估:多参数磁共振成像-经直肠超声(TRUS)融合活检和系统 TRUS 活检中的鹿特丹前列腺癌风险计算器。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.经会阴多参数磁共振成像-超声融合靶向前列腺活检在较小前列腺中检测临床显著前列腺癌。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Oct;40(10):451.e9-451.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Superiority of Transperineal Combined Fusion Biopsy Versus Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy: Lower Upgrading Rates and Better Concordance with Post-Surgical Histopathology.经会阴联合融合活检与经直肠超声引导活检的诊断优越性:更低的升级率以及与术后组织病理学更好的一致性
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 12;14(16):5698. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165698.
2
Enhancing Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Comparative Analysis of Combined Fusion and Systematic Biopsy Methods-A Single-Center Study.增强前列腺癌诊断:融合与系统活检联合方法的比较分析——一项单中心研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 19;14(8):2822. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082822.