Suppr超能文献

联合与单一神经刺激及传统吞咽障碍疗法对中风后吞咽障碍的比较效果:一项网状Meta分析。

Comparative Effectiveness of Combined and Single Neurostimulation and Traditional Dysphagia Therapies for Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Banda Kondwani Joseph, Wu Ko-Chiu, Jen Hsiu-Ju, Chu Hsin, Pien Li-Chung, Chen Ruey, Lee Tso-Ying, Lin Sheng-Kai, Hung Shih-Han, Chou Kuei-Ru

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei.

Endoscopy Unit, Surgery Department, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023 Apr;37(4):194-204. doi: 10.1177/15459683231166940. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparative therapeutic benefits of combined and single neurostimulation therapies including neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) remain unknown in post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) rehabilitation. Therefore, we performed the first network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine comparative effectiveness of combined and single neurostimulation and traditional dysphagia therapies for PSD.

METHODS

A frequentist NMA model was performed with therapy effect sizes presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for therapy comparisons while netrank function ranked the therapies in R-Software. Meta-regression models for study characteristics were analyzed using Bayesian NMA Model.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 randomized controlled studies with 2250 participants were included. NMES + TDT 3.82 (95% CI, 1.62-6.01), tDCS + TDT 3.34 (95% CI, 1.09-5.59), rTMS + TDT 3.32 (95% CI, 1.18-5.47), NMES 2.69 (95% CI, 0.44-4.93), and TDT 2.27 (95% CI, 0.12-4.41) demonstrated very large effect in improving swallowing function. NMES + TDT -0.50 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.32, rTMS + TDT -0.44 (95% CI, -0.67 to -0.21), TDT -0.28 (95% CI, -0.46 to -0.10), and NMES -0.19 (95% CI, -0.34 to -0.04) demonstrated medium to small effect in reducing pharyngeal transit time (PTT). rTMS -0.51 (95% CI, -0.93 to -0.08) demonstrated medium effect in reducing oral transit time (OTT). No significant therapy comparison differences were found for reducing aspiration/penetration. The highest ranked therapy was NMES + TDT for better swallowing function and reduction of PTT, rTMS for reduction of OTT, and tDCS + TDT for reduction of aspiration/penetration. Therapeutic effects of the therapies were moderated by frequency, sessions, and duration.

CONCLUSION

Combined therapies including NMES + TDT, tDCS + TDT, and rTMS + TDT demonstrate better therapeutic effect for improved swallowing function and reduction of PTT, OTT, and aspiration/penetration for PSD.

摘要

背景

在中风后吞咽困难(PSD)康复中,包括神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)、咽部电刺激(PES)、重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和传统吞咽困难疗法(TDT)在内的联合和单一神经刺激疗法的比较治疗益处仍不明确。因此,我们进行了首次网络荟萃分析(NMA),以确定联合和单一神经刺激及传统吞咽困难疗法对PSD的比较疗效。

方法

采用频率学派NMA模型,治疗效果大小以标准化均数差(SMD)和相应的95%置信区间(95%CI)表示用于治疗比较,而netrank函数在R软件中对疗法进行排序。使用贝叶斯NMA模型分析研究特征的荟萃回归模型。

结果

总体而言,纳入了50项随机对照研究,共2250名参与者。NMES + TDT 3.82(95%CI,1.62 - 6.01),tDCS + TDT 3.34(95%CI,1.09 - 5.59),rTMS + TDT 3.32(95%CI,1.18 - 5.47),NMES 2.69(95%CI,0.44 - 4.93),以及TDT 2.27(95%CI,0.12 - 4.41)在改善吞咽功能方面显示出非常大的效果。NMES + TDT -0.50(95%CI,-0.68至-0.32),rTMS + TDT -0.44(95%CI,-0.67至-0.21),TDT -0.28(95%CI,-0.46至-0.10),以及NMES -0.19(95%CI,-0.34至-0.04)在减少咽部通过时间(PTT)方面显示出中到小的效果。rTMS -0.51(95%CI,-0.93至-0.08)在减少口腔通过时间(OTT)方面显示出中等效果。在减少误吸/渗透方面未发现显著的治疗比较差异。在改善吞咽功能和减少PTT方面排名最高的疗法是NMES + TDT,在减少OTT方面是rTMS,在减少误吸/渗透方面是tDCS + TDT。疗法的治疗效果受到频率、疗程和持续时间的影响。

结论

包括NMES + TDT、tDCS + TDT和rTMS + TDT在内的联合疗法在改善PSD的吞咽功能以及减少PTT、OTT和误吸/渗透方面显示出更好的治疗效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验