Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Transfusion. 2023 Jun;63(6):1151-1160. doi: 10.1111/trf.17364. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
The risks of red blood cell transfusion may outweigh the benefits for many patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but guidelines from the Transfusion and Anemia eXpertise Initiative (TAXI) have not been consistently adopted. We sought to identify factors that influenced transfusion decision-making in PICUs to explore potential barriers and facilitators to implementing the guidelines.
A total of 50 ICU providers working in eight US ICUs of different types (non-cardiac PICUs, cardiovascular ICUs, combined units) and variable sizes (11-32 beds) completed semi-structured interviews. Providers included ICU attendings and trainees, nurse practitioners, nurses, and subspecialty physicians. Interviews examined factors that influenced transfusion decisions, transfusion practices, and provider beliefs. Qualitative analysis utilized a Framework Approach. Summarized data was compared between provider roles and units with consideration to identify patterns and unique informative statements.
Providers cited clinical, physiologic, anatomic, and logistic factors they considered in making transfusion decisions. Improving oxygen carrying capacity, hemodynamics and perfusion, respiratory function, volume deficits, and correcting laboratory values were among the reasons given for transfusion. Other sought-after benefits included alleviating symptoms of anemia, improving ICU throughput, and decreasing blood waste. Providers in different roles approached transfusion decisions differently, with the largest differences noted between nurses and subspecialists as compared with other ICU providers. While ICU attendings most often made the decision to transfuse, all providers influenced the decision-making.
Implementation of transfusion guidelines requires multi-professional approaches that emphasize the known risks of transfusion, its limited benefits, and highlight evidence around the safety and benefit of restrictive approaches.
对于许多儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的患者来说,红细胞输血的风险可能超过其益处,但输血和贫血专业知识倡议(TAXI)的指南并未得到一致采用。我们试图确定影响 PICU 输血决策的因素,以探讨实施指南的潜在障碍和促进因素。
共有 50 名在美国 8 家不同类型(非心脏 PICU、心血管 ICU、联合病房)和不同规模(11-32 张床)的 ICU 提供者完成了半结构化访谈。提供者包括 ICU 主治医生和住院医生、执业护士、护士和专科医生。访谈调查了影响输血决策、输血实践和提供者信念的因素。定性分析采用了框架方法。在比较不同角色和单位的汇总数据时,考虑了识别模式和独特信息性陈述的因素。
提供者列举了他们在做出输血决策时考虑的临床、生理、解剖和逻辑因素。提高携氧能力、血液动力学和灌注、呼吸功能、容量不足和纠正实验室值是输血的原因之一。其他期望的益处包括缓解贫血症状、提高 ICU 周转率和减少血液浪费。不同角色的提供者对输血决策的处理方式不同,护士和专科医生与其他 ICU 提供者之间的差异最大。虽然 ICU 主治医生最常决定输血,但所有提供者都影响了决策过程。
实施输血指南需要多专业方法,强调输血的已知风险、其有限益处,并强调有关限制性方法的安全性和益处的证据。