Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jul;81(7):813-819. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) has been validated as a clinical diagnostic guideline with high-sensitivity and -specificity in identifying TMDs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between DC/TMD diagnoses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnoses in patients with TMD.
A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients with TMD. The predictor variable was the clinical diagnosis of TMD based on DC/TMD criteria. The outcome variable was the MRI diagnosis of TMD. The diagnoses used for both the predictor variable and the outcome variable were the same. They were normal, disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), DDWR with intermittent locking, disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR) with limited opening, DDWOR without limited opening, degenerative joint disease, and subluxation. Age and gender of the patients and number of joints evaluated were covariates. Each subject had clinical examination performed by two independent Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All subjects had a bilateral temporomandibular joint (TMJ) MRI performed which was evaluated by a radiologist. The correlation between the clinical and MRI diagnoses was calculated using Cohen's kappa value with a P value of <.05 considered significant.
A total of fifty patients (100 TMJs) were enrolled with 38 females and 12 males. The mean ages were 31.92 and 31.75 years, respectively, with a total of 100 TMJs analyzed. Internal derangement was clinically identified in 76% of the joints and with MRI in 69% of joints. The Cohen's kappa value between DC/TMD and MRI diagnoses was found to be κ = 0.720 (P < .01). The respective sensitivity and specificity in determining disc position clinically for DDWR was 1 and 0.96; for DDWR with intermittent locking 0.78 and 0.91; for DDWOR with limited opening 0.9 and 0.98; for DDWOR without limited opening 1 and 0.9; for degenerative joint disease 0.63 and 0.97 and for subluxation 0.28 and 1.00.
The DC/TMD clinical examination performed well in all types of disc displacement but is less reliable than MRI in detecting the presence of degenerative disc diseases and subluxation.
颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD)已被验证为一种具有高灵敏度和特异性的临床诊断指南,可用于识别 TMD。本研究的目的是评估 DC/TMD 诊断与磁共振成像(MRI)诊断在 TMD 患者中的一致性。
对 TMD 患者进行前瞻性队列研究。预测变量为基于 DC/TMD 标准的 TMD 临床诊断。结果变量为 TMD 的 MRI 诊断。用于预测变量和结果变量的诊断相同,包括正常、可复性盘前移位(DDWR)、DDWR 伴间歇性锁结、不可复性盘前移位(DDWOR)伴开口受限、DDWOR 不伴开口受限、退行性关节病和半脱位。患者的年龄和性别以及评估的关节数为协变量。每位患者均由两位独立的口腔颌面外科医生进行临床检查。所有患者均进行双侧颞下颌关节(TMJ)MRI 检查,由放射科医生进行评估。使用 Cohen's kappa 值计算临床和 MRI 诊断之间的相关性,P 值<.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
共纳入 50 例患者(100 个 TMJ),其中女性 38 例,男性 12 例。平均年龄分别为 31.92 岁和 31.75 岁,共分析了 100 个 TMJ。76%的关节在临床上发现了内部紊乱,69%的关节在 MRI 上发现了内部紊乱。DC/TMD 和 MRI 诊断之间的 Cohen's kappa 值为 κ=0.720(P<.01)。临床上确定 DDWR 时的敏感性和特异性分别为 1 和 0.96;DDWR 伴间歇性锁结时分别为 0.78 和 0.91;DDWOR 伴开口受限时分别为 0.9 和 0.98;DDWOR 不伴开口受限时分别为 1 和 0.9;退行性关节病时分别为 0.63 和 0.97;半脱位时分别为 0.28 和 1.00。
DC/TMD 临床检查在所有类型的盘移位中表现良好,但在检测退行性盘疾病和半脱位方面不如 MRI 可靠。