• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物可吸收雷帕霉素洗脱支架与其他雷帕霉素洗脱支架在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征中的比较:GLASSY 和 TWILIGHT 的汇总分析。

Biolimus-eluting vs. other limus-eluting stents in NSTE-ACS: A pooled analysis of GLASSY and TWILIGHT.

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, United States of America.

Cardiocentro Ticino Institute and Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 15;383:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.027. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.027
PMID:37080466
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) may be associated with better outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to other current-generation limus-eluting stents (LES).

AIMS

To compare BP-BES with other current-generation LES in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We pooled individual data of Non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS patients from two large randomized controlled trials (GLASSY and TWILIGHT). The BP-BES groups consisted mostly of GLASSY patients, while the control group (other current-generation LES) included exclusively TWILIGHT patients. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis; the key secondary outcome was target-vessel failure (TVF). To account for trial design differences, outcomes were assessed at 3 months (short-term) and between 3 and 12 months (long-term) after PCI and subsequently pooled to estimate the 12-month hazards.

RESULTS

Of 7107 and 6053 NSTE-ACS patients included in the short- and long-term analysis, 32.7% and 36.5% received a BP-BES, respectively. Risk of MACE associated with BP-BES versus other LES was similar at short-term (1.1% vs 1.3%, adjusted HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.53-1.38), lower at long-term (1.7% vs 3.1%, adjusted HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.34-0.72), and lower in the entire 12-month period (pooled adjusted HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.45-0.82). The cumulative 12-month risk of TVF was reduced with BP-BES (adjusted HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38-0.70).

CONCLUSION

BP-BES was associated with lower 12-month risks of MACE and TVF compared to other current generation LES among NSTE-ACS patients treated with abbreviated or standard ticagrelor-based DAPT. These non-randomized findings are hypothesis-generating.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

Differences in clinical outcomes may exist between biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) and other current-generation limus-eluting stent (LES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We pooled individual data of about 7000 Non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients undergoing PCI and treated with ticagrelor with or without aspirin from two large randomized controlled trials (GLASSY and TWILIGHT). BP-BES patients derived very largely from GLASSY and other LES patients from TWILIGHT. In this population, BP-BES compared to other current generation LES, were associated with a lower 12-month risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and target-vessel failure.

摘要

背景

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,可生物降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架(BP-BES)与其他当前代雷帕霉素洗脱支架(LES)相比,可能具有更好的结果。

目的

比较 BP-BES 与 ACS 患者 PCI 中使用的其他当前代 LES。

方法

我们汇总了来自两项大型随机对照试验(GLASSY 和 TWILIGHT)的非 ST 段抬高(NSTE)ACS 患者的个体数据。BP-BES 组主要由 GLASSY 患者组成,而对照组(其他当前代 LES)仅包括 TWILIGHT 患者。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死或支架血栓形成;关键次要终点是靶血管失败(TVF)。为了考虑试验设计差异,在 PCI 后 3 个月(短期)和 3 至 12 个月(长期)评估结果,并随后进行汇总以估计 12 个月的危险。

结果

在纳入短期和长期分析的 7107 名和 6053 名 NSTE-ACS 患者中,分别有 32.7%和 36.5%接受了 BP-BES。与其他 LES 相比,BP-BES 与 MACE 相关的风险在短期(1.1%比 1.3%,调整 HR 0.86,95%CI 0.53-1.38)、长期(1.7%比 3.1%,调整 HR 0.49,95%CI 0.34-0.72)和整个 12 个月(汇总调整 HR 0.61,95%CI 0.45-0.82)相似。BP-BES 降低了 12 个月 TVF 的累积风险(调整 HR 0.52,95%CI 0.38-0.70)。

结论

与其他当前代 LES 相比,在接受缩短或标准替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗的 NSTE-ACS 患者中,BP-BES 与 12 个月时 MACE 和 TVF 的风险降低相关。这些非随机发现是产生假说的。

相似文献

1
Biolimus-eluting vs. other limus-eluting stents in NSTE-ACS: A pooled analysis of GLASSY and TWILIGHT.生物可吸收雷帕霉素洗脱支架与其他雷帕霉素洗脱支架在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征中的比较:GLASSY 和 TWILIGHT 的汇总分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 15;383:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.027. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
3
Thin Strut CoCr Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus A9-Eluting Stents versus Thicker Strut Stainless Steel Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus A9-Eluting Stents: Two-Year Clinical Outcomes.薄支架钴铬可生物降解聚合物依维莫司 A9 洗脱支架与厚支架不锈钢可生物降解聚合物依维莫司 A9 洗脱支架的比较:两年临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;2021:6654515. doi: 10.1155/2021/6654515. eCollection 2021.
4
Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:来自 COMPARE II 试验的最终 5 年报告(管腔生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1215-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Two-year clinical outcomes of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting durable-polymer-coated stents versus biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer-coated stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction with dyslipidemia after percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the KAMIR.佐他莫司和依维莫司洗脱耐用聚合物涂层支架与生物雷帕霉素洗脱可生物降解聚合物涂层支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性心肌梗死伴血脂异常患者中的两年临床结局:来自KAMIR的数据
Heart Vessels. 2019 Feb;34(2):237-250. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1251-0. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
6
Safety and efficacy profile of bioresorbable-polylactide-polymer-biolimus-A9-eluting stents versus durable-polymer-everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.生物可吸收聚丙交酯聚合物生物雷帕霉素 A9 洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司和佐他莫司洗脱支架在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性概况。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 15;88(6):E173-E182. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26617. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
7
Five-year clinical outcomes and intracoronary imaging findings of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial: randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.COMFORTABLE AMI 试验的 5 年临床结果和冠状动脉影像学研究:急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,载药涂层生物可降解聚合物支架与金属裸支架的随机对照比较。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 21;40(24):1909-1919. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz074.
8
Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.载有雷帕霉素的可生物降解聚合物涂层支架改善急性心肌梗死患者的临床结局。
Heart. 2015 Feb;101(4):271-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306359. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
9
Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者中生物可降解聚合物生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的对比
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;183:190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.036. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
Long-term outcomes after coronary intervention with biodegradable polymer stents in patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者应用生物可吸收聚合物支架冠状动脉介入治疗的长期结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Feb;103(2):276-285. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30937. Epub 2023 Dec 13.