Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University Seoul, Korea.
Ann Lab Med. 2023 Sep 1;43(5):503-507. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.503. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
The fifth edition of the WHO classification (2022 WHO) and the International Consensus Classification (2022 ICC) of myeloid neoplasms have been recently published. We reviewed the changes in the diagnosis distribution in patients with MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB) or AML using both classifications. Forty-seven patients previously diagnosed as having AML or MDS-EB with available mutation analysis data, including targeted next-generation and RNA-sequencing data, were included. We reclassified 15 (31.9%) and 27 (57.4%) patients based on the 2022 WHO and 2022 ICC, respectively. One patient was reclassified as having a translocation categorized as a rare recurring translocation in both classifications. Reclassification was mostly due to the addition of mutation-based diagnostic criteria (i.e., AML, myelodysplasia-related) or a new entity associated with mutation. In both classifications, MDS diagnosis required the confirmation of multi-hit alterations. Among 14 patients with mutations, 11 harbored multi-hit alterations, including four with mutations and loss of heterozygosity. Adverse prognosis was associated with multi-hit alterations (=0.009) in patients with MDS-EB, emphasizing the importance of detecting the mutations at diagnosis. The implementation of these classifications may lead to the identification of different subtypes from previously heterogeneous diagnostic categories based on genetic characteristics.
世界卫生组织(WHO)第五版分类(2022 年版)和髓系肿瘤国际共识分类(2022 年版)最近已经发布。我们使用这两种分类方法,回顾了骨髓增生异常综合征伴原始细胞增多(MDS-EB)或急性髓系白血病(AML)患者诊断分布的变化。纳入了 47 例之前诊断为 AML 或 MDS-EB 的患者,这些患者具有可用的突变分析数据,包括靶向二代测序和 RNA 测序数据。我们根据 2022 年版 WHO 和 2022 年版 ICC 重新分类了 15(31.9%)和 27(57.4%)例患者。1 例患者因两种分类均归类为罕见重现易位的易位而被重新分类。重新分类主要是由于增加了基于突变的诊断标准(即 AML、伴骨髓增生异常相关的)或与突变相关的新实体。在这两种分类中,MDS 诊断需要确认多打击改变。在 14 例携带 突变的患者中,11 例存在多打击 改变,包括 4 例存在 突变和杂合性缺失。MDS-EB 患者存在多打击 改变与不良预后相关(=0.009),强调了在诊断时检测突变的重要性。这些分类的实施可能会根据遗传特征,从以前异质的诊断类别中识别出不同的亚型。