• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨髓增生异常综合征及相关疾病的国际共识分类

The International Consensus Classification of myelodysplastic syndromes and related entities.

作者信息

Hasserjian Robert P, Orazi Attilio, Orfao Alberto, Rozman Maria, Wang Sa A

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Warren 244, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Department of Pathology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.

出版信息

Virchows Arch. 2023 Jan;482(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03417-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00428-022-03417-1
PMID:36287260
Abstract

The International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia has updated the classification of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and placed MDS in a broader group of clonal cytopenias that includes clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) and related entities. Although subject to some interobserver variability and lack of specificity, morphologic dysplasia remains the main feature that distinguishes MDS from other clonal cytopenias and defines MDS as a hematologic malignancy. The ICC has introduced some changes in the definition of MDS whereby some cases categorized as MDS based on cytogenetic abnormalities are now classified as CCUS, while SF3B1 and multi-hit TP53 mutations are now considered to be MDS-defining in a cytopenic patient. The ICC has also recognized several cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities that reclassify some cases of MDS with excess blasts as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and has introduced a new MDS/AML entity that encompasses cases with 10-19% blasts that lie on the continuum between MDS and AML. Two new genetically defined categories of MDS have been introduced: MDS with mutated SF3B1 and MDS with mutated TP53, the latter requiring bi-allelic aberrations in the TP53 gene. The entity MDS, unclassifiable has been eliminated. These changes have resulted in an overall simplification of the MDS classification scheme from 8 separate entities (including 1 that was genetically defined) in the revised 4th edition WHO classification to 7 separate entities (including 3 that are genetically defined) in the ICC.

摘要

髓系肿瘤和急性白血病的国际共识分类(ICC)更新了骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的分类,并将MDS归为更广泛的一组克隆性血细胞减少症,其中包括意义未明的克隆性血细胞减少症(CCUS)及相关实体。尽管存在一定的观察者间差异且缺乏特异性,但形态学发育异常仍是区分MDS与其他克隆性血细胞减少症的主要特征,并将MDS定义为一种血液系统恶性肿瘤。ICC在MDS的定义上引入了一些变化,据此,一些基于细胞遗传学异常被归类为MDS的病例现在被分类为CCUS,而SF3B1和多打击TP53突变现在被认为在血细胞减少的患者中可定义MDS。ICC还认识到一些细胞遗传学和分子异常,这些异常将一些伴原始细胞增多的MDS病例重新分类为急性髓系白血病(AML),并引入了一个新的MDS/AML实体类别,其中包括原始细胞比例为10%-19%、处于MDS和AML之间连续状态的病例。引入了两个新的基于遗传学定义的MDS类别:伴有SF3B1突变的MDS和伴有TP53突变的MDS,后者要求TP53基因存在双等位基因畸变。无法分类的MDS实体类别已被取消。这些变化使得MDS分类方案从世界卫生组织(WHO)修订的第4版分类中的8个独立实体(包括1个基于遗传学定义的实体)总体简化为ICC中的7个独立实体(包括3个基于遗传学定义的实体)。

相似文献

1
The International Consensus Classification of myelodysplastic syndromes and related entities.骨髓增生异常综合征及相关疾病的国际共识分类
Virchows Arch. 2023 Jan;482(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03417-1.
2
Clinico-genetic and prognostic analyses of 716 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification.基于 2022 年国际共识分类,对 716 例原发性骨髓增生异常综合征和骨髓增生异常综合征/急性髓系白血病患者的临床-遗传学和预后分析。
Am J Hematol. 2023 Mar;98(3):398-407. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26799. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
3
Implications of the 5 Edition of the World Health Organization Classification and International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasm in Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Excess Blasts and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.5 版世界卫生组织分类和骨髓增生异常综合征伴原始细胞增多和急性髓系白血病的国际共识分类对髓系肿瘤的影响。
Ann Lab Med. 2023 Sep 1;43(5):503-507. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.503. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
Diagnosis and classification of myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征的诊断和分类。
Blood. 2023 Dec 28;142(26):2247-2257. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023020078.
5
The new WHO and ICC classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes and their impact on the clinical laboratory.世界卫生组织和国际骨髓瘤工作组新修订的骨髓增生异常综合征分类系统及其对临床实验室的影响
J Hematop. 2023 Jun;16(2):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s12308-023-00538-7. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
6
Recent advances in the diagnosis and classification of myeloid neoplasms--comments on the 2008 WHO classification.髓系肿瘤诊断和分类的最新进展——对 2008 年 WHO 分类的评论。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2010 Oct;32(5):461-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2010.01246.x. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
7
A comparison of WHO-5 and ICC classifications in a series of myeloid neoplasms, considerations for hematopathologists and molecular pathologists.一系列骨髓增生性肿瘤中 WHO-5 和 ICC 分类的比较,对血液病理学家和分子病理学家的思考。
Cancer Genet. 2024 Aug;286-287:25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
8
The International Consensus Classification of acute myeloid leukemia.急性髓系白血病国际共识分类
Virchows Arch. 2023 Jan;482(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03430-4. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
9
Molecular landscape of myelodysplastic neoplasms in disease classification and prognostication.骨髓增生异常肿瘤的分子特征在疾病分类和预后判断中的作用。
Curr Opin Hematol. 2023 Mar 1;30(2):30-37. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000752. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
10
A Lower Frequency of Spliceosome Mutations Distinguishes Clonal Cytopenias of Undetermined Significance From Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Despite Inherent Similarities in Genomic, Laboratory, and Clinical Features.剪接体突变的低频率可将意义未明的克隆性血细胞减少症与低危骨髓增生异常综合征区分开来,尽管在基因组、实验室和临床特征方面存在内在相似性。
Mod Pathol. 2023 Mar;36(3):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100068. Epub 2023 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
TLR7/8 ligands R848 and imiquimod induce differentiation of bone marrow cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome towards mature neutrophils.Toll样受体7/8(TLR7/8)配体R848和咪喹莫特可诱导骨髓增生异常综合征患者的骨髓细胞向成熟中性粒细胞分化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 26;15(1):31496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15859-z.
2
Oxidative Stress and Its Role in the Emergence and Progression of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Insights from Proteomic Analysis and Other Methodologies.氧化应激及其在骨髓增生异常综合征发生和发展中的作用:蛋白质组学分析及其他方法的见解
Proteomes. 2025 Jun 3;13(2):21. doi: 10.3390/proteomes13020021.
3
High-Efficiency Enrichment of Megakaryocytes and Identification of Micromegakaryocytes from Human Bone Marrow by Imaging Flow Cytometry.
利用成像流式细胞术从人骨髓中高效富集巨核细胞并鉴定微巨核细胞
Cells. 2025 Apr 12;14(8):588. doi: 10.3390/cells14080588.
4
A 9-year-old child presenting with anemia accompanied by abnormal red blood cell morphology.一名9岁儿童出现贫血并伴有异常红细胞形态。
Pract Lab Med. 2025 Mar 20;45:e00459. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00459. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Complex Genetic Evolution and Treatment Challenges in Myeloid Neoplasms: A Case of Persistent t(2;3)(p15~23;q26)/ Rearrangement, Mutation, and Transient Chimera.髓系肿瘤中的复杂遗传进化与治疗挑战:一例持续性t(2;3)(p15~23;q26)/重排、突变及短暂嵌合体病例
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2025 Jan-Feb;22(1):24-33. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20483.
6
Are TP53 mutations all alike?TP53基因的突变都一样吗?
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024 Dec 6;2024(1):321-325. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2024000556.
7
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with NPM1 mutation or acute myeloid leukemia?伴有NPM1突变的慢性粒单核细胞白血病还是急性髓系白血病?
Oncologist. 2025 Feb 6;30(2). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae246.
8
NGS panel enhance precise diagnosis of myeloid neoplasms under WHO-HAEM5 and International Consensus Classification: An observational study.下一代测序panel 增强 WHO-HAEM5 和国际共识分类下髓系肿瘤的精确诊断:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 14;103(24):e38556. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038556.
9
A Brief Overview of the Molecular Landscape of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms.骨髓增生异常肿瘤分子特征概述
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 23;31(5):2353-2363. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050175.
10
Comparative analysis of feature-based ML and CNN for binucleated erythroblast quantification in myelodysplastic syndrome patients using imaging flow cytometry data.基于特征的机器学习和卷积神经网络在利用成像流式细胞术数据对骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的双核幼红细胞进行定量分析的比较
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 23;14(1):9349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59875-x.