Suppr超能文献

信息过载:学生在考试中对药理学资源的表现和看法。

Information overdose: Student performance and perceptions of pharmacology resources on exams.

机构信息

Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023 Jun;11(3):e01087. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1087.

Abstract

Physicians of the future will be expected to synthesize new knowledge and appropriately apply it in patient care. Here, we report on the effects of and student attitudes towards resource-enhanced exams by comparing student performance on closed-book exams with or without access to pharmacology flashcards. Setting: the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine (SOM), class of 2021 (N = 149), followed over 4 years. We provided pharmacology flashcards for studying purposes in all blocks; flashcards were only accessible during closed-book exams in 2 of 5 blocks. We collected pharmacology open-ended question (OEQ) scores and analyzed results using repeated measures ANOVA (SPSS). We collected MS4 survey data using Qualtrics and conducted a thematic content analysis. Performance on pharmacology questions on exams was not higher with access to pharmacology flashcards during exams. The number of students who passed pharmacology questions without flashcards on exams was as follows: 137 ± 3.7, 132 ± 5.0, and 134 ± 7.9 (average ± SEM). The number of students who passed pharmacology questions with flashcards on exams was as follows: 132 ± 6.6 and 120 ± 7.5. Survey comments revealed several themes. Access to pharmacology flashcards during exams allowed learners to focus on understanding the bigger picture and reduced stress. A subset of students reported having access to flashcards on pre-clerkship exams hurt their preparation for clerkships. Flashcards as exam resources were received well by approximately half the class, who reported benefits including more time to focus on understanding bigger picture concepts and reduced stress.

摘要

未来的医生将需要综合新的知识并将其适当地应用于患者护理中。在这里,我们通过比较有和没有药理学抽认卡的闭卷考试中学生的表现,报告了资源增强型考试的效果和学生态度。背景:加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)医学院 2021 年级(N=149),经过 4 年的跟踪调查。我们在所有学习阶段都提供药理学抽认卡作为学习用途;在 5 个学习阶段中的 2 个阶段,抽认卡仅在闭卷考试期间可以使用。我们收集了药理学开放式问题(OEQ)的分数,并使用重复测量方差分析(SPSS)分析结果。我们使用 Qualtrics 收集 MS4 调查数据,并进行主题内容分析。在考试中使用药理学抽认卡并不能提高药理学问题的表现。在没有使用抽认卡的情况下,在考试中答对药理学问题的学生人数如下:137±3.7、132±5.0 和 134±7.9(平均值±SEM)。在考试中使用抽认卡答对药理学问题的学生人数如下:132±6.6 和 120±7.5。调查评论揭示了几个主题。在考试中使用药理学抽认卡可以让学习者专注于理解大局,减轻压力。有一小部分学生报告说,在预科考试中使用抽认卡会影响他们为实习做准备。大约一半的学生对作为考试资源的抽认卡表示欢迎,他们报告说,使用抽认卡的好处包括有更多的时间专注于理解大局概念和减轻压力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cb/10119486/6e195a0122f0/PRP2-11-e01087-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验