Suppr超能文献

亚洲心房颤动患者华法林标准强度与低强度抗凝的多中心随机对照试验。

Standard-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Anticoagulation with Warfarin in Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231171081. doi: 10.1177/10760296231171081.

Abstract

Anticoagulation with warfarin in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often has been decreased as an international normalized ratio (INR) of prothrombin time 1.6-2.6 due to fear of bleeding, although universal criteria recommend an INR of 2.0-3.0. In this randomized, open-label trial, low-intensity anticoagulation (INR 1.6-2.6) was compared with standard-intensity anticoagulation (INR 2.0-3.0) with warfarin. A total 616 patients with AF and at least 1 risk factor for stroke were randomized to low-intensity anticoagulation (n = 308) and standard-intensity anticoagulation (n = 308) groups. The intention-to-treat analysis was performed to determine differences. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. New-onset stroke occurred in 2 patients (0.44% per year) in the low-intensity group and 5 patients (1.05% per year) in the standard-intensity group (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.08-2.15). Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients (0.89% per year) in the low-intensity group and 5 patients (1.06% per year) in the standard-intensity group (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.22-3.11). The rate of the net clinical outcome (composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death) was 1.33% per year in the low-intensity group compared with 2.12% per year in the standard-intensity group (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.23-1.72). In Asian patients with AF, clinical outcomes were not different between low-intensity and standard-intensity anticoagulation with warfarin.

摘要

在亚洲房颤(AF)患者中,华法林抗凝治疗通常将国际标准化比值(INR)设定为 1.6-2.6,以防止出血,尽管通用标准建议 INR 范围为 2.0-3.0。在这项随机、开放标签试验中,低强度抗凝(INR 1.6-2.6)与华法林标准强度抗凝(INR 2.0-3.0)进行了比较。共有 616 名 AF 且至少有 1 个中风危险因素的患者被随机分配到低强度抗凝组(n=308)和标准强度抗凝组(n=308)。进行意向治疗分析以确定差异。两组的基线特征相当。低强度组有 2 例(0.44%/年)新发卒中,标准强度组有 5 例(1.05%/年)新发卒中(HR 0.42,95%CI 0.08-2.15)。低强度组有 4 例(0.89%/年)发生大出血,标准强度组有 5 例(1.06%/年)发生大出血(HR 0.84,95%CI 0.22-3.11)。低强度组净临床结局(卒中、全身性栓塞、大出血和死亡的复合结局)发生率为 1.33%/年,标准强度组为 2.12%/年(HR 0.63,95%CI 0.23-1.72)。在亚洲 AF 患者中,华法林低强度和标准强度抗凝的临床结局无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f4/10126601/7707a45464d8/10.1177_10760296231171081-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验