Department of Vascular and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.
The Second Clinical Medical School, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
World J Surg. 2023 Aug;47(8):2076-2084. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07019-z. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
The influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on mortality following lower extremity amputation (LEA) remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the influence of DM on long-term mortality (LTM) and short-term mortality (STM) after amputation.
The Medline, the Cochrane library, and Embase databases were searched. The primary and secondary outcomes were LTM and STM following amputation. One-year and 30-day all-cause mortality after amputation were considered as LTM and STM, respectively. A random-effects model was utilized to pool results. To evaluate the stability of results, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted.
Twenty-three cohort studies with a total of 58,219 patients were included, among which 31,750 (54.5%) patients had DM. The mean score of included studies evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was 7.65, indicating moderate to high quality. The pooled results showed no significant difference in 1-year LTM (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% CI 0.86-1.07) after amputation. However, 3-year (RR, 1.22; 95% CI 1.01-1.47) and 5-year (RR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.07-1.31) LTMs of DM patients were obviously higher than that of NDM (non-diabetes mellitus) patients. The STM of the DM group was significantly lower than the NDM group (RR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.64-0.98).
The current study revealed that DM patients had an obvious lower STM following LEA, but the risk of DM on LTM after amputation was gradually increased with time. More attention should be paid to the long-term survival of DM patients after LEA.
糖尿病(DM)对下肢截肢(LEA)后死亡率的影响仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定 DM 对截肢后长期死亡率(LTM)和短期死亡率(STM)的影响。
检索 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 数据库。主要和次要结局是截肢后的 LTM 和 STM。截肢后 1 年和 30 天的全因死亡率分别被视为 LTM 和 STM。采用随机效应模型对结果进行汇总。为评估结果的稳定性,进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析。
共纳入 23 项队列研究,总计 58219 例患者,其中 31750 例(54.5%)患者患有 DM。根据 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表评估,纳入研究的平均评分为 7.65,表明质量为中等到较高。汇总结果显示,截肢后 1 年 LTM 无显著差异(风险比 [RR],0.96;95%置信区间 [CI],0.86-1.07)。然而,DM 患者的 3 年(RR,1.22;95%CI,1.01-1.47)和 5 年(RR,1.18;95%CI,1.07-1.31)LTM 明显高于非 DM(非糖尿病)患者。DM 组的 STM 明显低于非 DM 组(RR,0.80;95%CI,0.64-0.98)。
本研究表明,DM 患者截肢后 STM 明显较低,但随着时间的推移,DM 对截肢后 LTM 的风险逐渐增加。应更加关注 DM 患者截肢后的长期生存情况。