在刑事司法系统中使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍和促进因素:临床医生的观点。

Barriers and facilitators to the use of medication for opioid use disorder within the criminal justice system: Perspectives from clinicians.

机构信息

University of Kentucky College of Arts & Sciences, Department of Sociology, 1515 Patterson Office Tower, Lexington, KY 40506, United States of America.

University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Department of Health Management & Policy, 111 Washington Ave, Lexington, KY 40536, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Jun;149:209051. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209051. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study examines social service clinicians' (SSCs) perspectives of factors within the criminal justice system that impact justice-involved individuals' use of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Opioid use disorder (OUD) rates are high among justice-involved individuals, and overdose risk is heightened upon release from incarceration. This study is innovative, as it specifically focuses on criminal justice contexts that influence the MOUD continuum of care from the perspective of clinicians working within the criminal justice system. Understanding criminal justice-related facilitators and barriers to MOUD treatment will guide tailored policy intervention to increase MOUD use and promote recovery and remission among justice-involved individuals.

METHODS

The study completed qualitative interviews with 25 SSCs who are employed by a state department of corrections to provide assessment and referrals to substance use treatment to individuals on community supervision. The study used NVivo software to code the major themes found within each transcribed interview; two research assistants participated in consensus coding to ensure consistency in coding across transcripts. This study focused on the secondary codes that fell under the "Criminal Justice System" primary code, as well as codes that indicated barriers and facilitators to MOUD treatment.

RESULTS

SSCs cited sentencing time credits as structural facilitators of MOUD treatment; clients sought more information about extended-release naltrexone since time off of their sentence was available if initiated. Support for extended-release naltrexone by officers and judges was often mentioned as an attitudinal facilitator of initiation. Poor intra-agency collaboration among department of corrections agents was an institutional barrier to MOUD. Also, probation and parole officers' stigma surrounding other types of MOUD, specifically buprenorphine and methadone, was an attitudinal barrier to MOUD within the criminal justice system.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should examine the effect that time credits have on extended-release naltrexone initiation, considering the wide consensus among SSCs that their clients were motivated to initiate this type of MOUD because of the resulting time off their sentences. Stigma among probation and parole officers and lack of communication within the criminal justice system need to be addressed so that more individuals with OUD may be exposed to life-saving treatments.

摘要

简介

本研究考察了社会服务临床医生(SSC)对刑事司法系统内影响涉及司法的个体使用阿片类药物治疗药物使用障碍(MOUD)的因素的看法。涉及司法的个体中阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的发生率很高,且从监禁中释放后,过量的风险会增加。本研究具有创新性,因为它专门从在刑事司法系统内工作的临床医生的角度研究了影响 MOUD 连续护理的刑事司法相关因素。了解 MOUD 治疗的与刑事司法相关的促进因素和障碍将指导有针对性的政策干预,以增加 MOUD 的使用,并促进涉及司法的个体的康复和缓解。

方法

本研究对 25 名 SSC 进行了定性访谈,这些 SSC 受雇于州惩教部,为社区监督下的个人提供药物使用评估和转介到治疗服务。研究使用 NVivo 软件对每个转录访谈中发现的主要主题进行编码;两名研究助理参与共识编码,以确保跨转录的编码一致性。本研究重点关注属于“刑事司法系统”主要代码的次要代码,以及表示 MOUD 治疗障碍和促进因素的代码。

结果

SSC 提到刑期信用是 MOUD 治疗的结构性促进因素;如果开始治疗,客户会因为有时间服刑而寻求更多关于延长释放纳曲酮的信息。官员和法官对延长释放纳曲酮的支持经常被提及,这是启动治疗的态度促进因素。惩教部代理人之间不良的机构内协作是 MOUD 的机构障碍。此外,缓刑和假释官员对其他类型的 MOUD(特别是丁丙诺啡和美沙酮)的污名化是刑事司法系统中 MOUD 的态度障碍。

结论

未来的研究应该研究时间信用对延长释放纳曲酮启动的影响,考虑到 SSC 广泛一致认为,他们的客户因服刑时间减少而有动力启动这种类型的 MOUD。需要解决缓刑和假释官员的污名化以及刑事司法系统内缺乏沟通的问题,以便更多的 OUD 患者可以接触到救命治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索