Cooper Hannah Lf, Cloud David H, Freeman Patricia R, Fadanelli Monica, Green Travis, Van Meter Connor, Beane Stephanie, Ibragimov Umedjon, Young April M
Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta GA.
Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta GA.
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Nov;85:102701. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102701. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
Buprenorphine is a cornerstone to curbing opioid epidemics, but emerging data suggest that rural pharmacists in the US sometimes refuse to dispense this medication. We conducted a case study to explore buprenorphine dispensing practices in 12 rural Appalachian Kentucky counties, and analyze whether and how they were shaped by features of the rural risk environment.
In this case study, we conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with 14 pharmacists operating 15 pharmacies in these counties to explore buprenorphine dispensing practices and perceived influences on these practices. Thematic analyses of the resulting transcripts revealed three features of the rural risk environment that shaped dispensing. To explore these three risk environment features, we analyzed policy documents (e.g., Attorney General lawsuits) and administrative databases (e.g., incarceration data). Textual documents were analyzed using thematic analyses and administrative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; memoes explored relationships among risk environment features and dispensing practices.
Twelve of the 15 pharmacies limited dispensing, by refusing to serve new patients; limiting dispensing to known patients or prescribers; or refusing to dispense buprenorphine altogether. Concerns about exceeding a "Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) cap" on opioid dispensing stifled dispensing. A legacy of aggressive and fraudulent marketing of opioid analgesics (OAs) by pharmaceutical companies and physician OA overprescribing undermined pharmacist trust in buprenorphine and in its prescribers. The escalating local war on drugs may have undermined dispensing by reinforcing stigma against people who use drugs.
Initiatives to increase buprenorphine prescribing must be accompanied by policy changes to increase dispensing. Specifically, buprenorphine should be removed from opioid monitoring systems; efforts to de-escalate the war on drugs should be extended to encompass rural areas; initiatives to dismantle aggressive OA marketing should be strengthened; and efforts to re-build pharmacist trust in physicians are needed.
丁丙诺啡是遏制阿片类药物流行的基石,但新出现的数据表明,美国农村地区的药剂师有时会拒绝配发这种药物。我们开展了一项案例研究,以探究肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区12个农村县的丁丙诺啡配发做法,并分析这些做法是否以及如何受到农村风险环境特征的影响。
在本案例研究中,我们对在这些县经营15家药店的14名药剂师进行了一对一的半结构化访谈,以探究丁丙诺啡的配发做法以及对这些做法的感知影响。对所得访谈记录进行的主题分析揭示了影响配发的农村风险环境的三个特征。为探究这三个风险环境特征,我们分析了政策文件(如总检察长诉讼)和行政数据库(如监禁数据)。使用主题分析对文本文件进行分析,使用描述性统计对行政数据进行分析;通过备忘录探究风险环境特征与配发做法之间的关系。
15家药店中有12家限制配发,方式包括拒绝为新患者服务;将配发限制于已知患者或开处方者;或完全拒绝配发丁丙诺啡。对超过阿片类药物配发的“药品执法管理局(DEA)上限”的担忧抑制了配发。制药公司对阿片类镇痛药(OA)进行激进和欺诈性营销的遗留影响以及医生对OA的过度开处方破坏了药剂师对丁丙诺啡及其开处方者的信任。不断升级的地方禁毒战争可能通过强化对吸毒者的污名化而破坏了配发。
增加丁丙诺啡处方的举措必须伴随政策变革以增加配发。具体而言,应将丁丙诺啡从阿片类药物监测系统中移除;应将缓和禁毒战争的努力扩展至农村地区;应加强拆除激进的OA营销的举措;并且需要努力重建药剂师对医生的信任。