Suppr超能文献

非典型抗精神病药诱发的躁狂症:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Atypical antipsychotic-induced mania: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Av Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal; Psychiatric and Medical Psychology University Clinic, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Mood Disorders Program and Women's Health Concerns Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7, Canada.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2023 Jul 15;333:420-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.037. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The possibility of atypical antipsychotics (AA) to induce manic symptoms has been raised by several articles. The objective of this study was to describe whether exposure to AA may induce mania in mood disorders.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. The systematic search encompassed all relevant studies published until April 4th, 2022. A meta-analysis testing whether treatment emergent mania (TEM) is more frequent with the use of AA compared with placebo was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 52 studies were included in the systematic review. We found 24 case reports or case series describing 40 manic/hypomanic episodes allegedly induced by AA. Twenty-one placebo-controlled trials were included in a meta-analysis including 4823 individuals treated with AA and 3252 individuals receiving placebo. Our meta-analysis showed that the use of AA protects against the development of TEM (OR: 0.68 [95 % CI: 0.52-0.89], p = 0.005).

LIMITATIONS

AA-induced mania/hypomania was not the primary outcome in any of the observational or interventional studies. TEM was not homogeneously defined across studies. In most case reports it was not possible to establish causality between the use of AA and the development of manic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

TEM is more frequent with placebo than with AA, which suggests that AA exposure does not represent a relevant risk for TEM. Mania/hypomania induced by an AA seems to be rare events, since anecdotal evidence from case reports and case series were not observed in observational prospective and interventional studies.

摘要

背景

一些文章提出了非典型抗精神病药物(AA)引起躁狂症状的可能性。本研究的目的是描述暴露于 AA 是否会在心境障碍中诱发躁狂。

方法

我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行了系统审查。系统搜索涵盖了截至 2022 年 4 月 4 日发表的所有相关研究。进行了一项荟萃分析,以测试与使用安慰剂相比,使用 AA 是否更频繁地出现治疗性躁狂(TEM)。

结果

系统综述共纳入 52 项研究。我们发现 24 项病例报告或病例系列描述了据称由 AA 引起的 40 例躁狂/轻躁狂发作。21 项安慰剂对照试验纳入了一项荟萃分析,该分析纳入了 4823 名接受 AA 治疗的个体和 3252 名接受安慰剂的个体。我们的荟萃分析表明,使用 AA 可预防 TEM 的发生(OR:0.68 [95%CI:0.52-0.89],p=0.005)。

局限性

在任何观察性或干预性研究中,AA 引起的躁狂/轻躁狂均不是主要结局。TEM 在研究之间没有统一定义。在大多数病例报告中,无法确定 AA 的使用与躁狂症状的发展之间的因果关系。

结论

与 AA 相比,TEM 更常见于安慰剂,这表明 AA 暴露不会增加 TEM 的风险。AA 引起的躁狂/轻躁狂似乎是罕见事件,因为病例报告和病例系列的轶事证据在观察性前瞻性和干预性研究中并未观察到。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验