• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffolds: Insights from the SHERPA-MAGIC study.西罗莫司洗脱可吸收镁支架治疗患者的长期结果:来自 SHERPA-MAGIC 研究的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 15;383:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.029. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Magmaris Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Versus Conventional Drug-Eluting Stent in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: 1-Year Results of a Propensity-Score-Matching Comparison.镁可吸收血管支架与传统药物洗脱支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Oct;43:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.05.028. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Drug-Eluting Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Implantation in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot Study.药物洗脱可吸收镁支架植入术治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死:一项试点研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jun;30(6):202-206. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
4
Sirolimus-Eluting Magnesium Resorbable Scaffold Implantation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.西罗莫司洗脱可吸收镁支架在急性心肌梗死患者中的植入
Cardiology. 2019;142(2):93-96. doi: 10.1159/000499536. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
Outcomes in Patients Treated With Thin-Strut, Very Thin-Strut, or Ultrathin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Small Coronary Vessels: A Prespecified Analysis of the Randomized BIO-RESORT Trial.小血管病变患者中应用薄支架、超薄支架或极薄支架药物洗脱支架的临床结局:随机 BIO-RESORT 试验的预设分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;4(7):659-669. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1776.
6
Sustained Safety and Performance of the Second-Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Absorbable Metal Scaffold: Pooled Outcomes of the BIOSOLVE-II and -III Trials at 3 Years.第二代西罗莫司洗脱可吸收金属支架的持续安全性和性能:BIOSOLVE-II 和 -III 试验的 3 年汇总结果。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Sep;21(9):1150-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):537-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00979-4. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: study protocol of the randomized controlled EVERBIO II trial.依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架和生物雷帕霉素洗脱冠状动脉支架与依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架的比较:随机对照EVERBIO II试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2014 Jan 7;15:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-9.
9
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
MAGnesium-based bioresorbable scaffold and vasomotor function in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: The MAGSTEMI trial: Rationale and design.基于镁的生物可吸收支架与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者血管舒缩功能:MAGSTEMI 试验:原理与设计。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):64-70. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27825. Epub 2018 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The preclinical study of biocompatibility of tyrosine polycarbonate bioresorbable scaffold in small caliber porcine peripheral arteries.酪氨酸聚碳酸酯生物可吸收支架在小型猪外周小口径动脉中的生物相容性临床前研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91759-6.

西罗莫司洗脱可吸收镁支架治疗患者的长期结果:来自 SHERPA-MAGIC 研究的见解。

Long-term outcomes of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffolds: Insights from the SHERPA-MAGIC study.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.

Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 15;383:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.029. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.029
PMID:37085121
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The resorbable magnesium scaffold (RMS) is a second-generation bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) that has shown conflicting results in previous studies. These findings suggest that patient selection and implantation technique may have an impact on clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the safety and long-term effectiveness of RMS in a narrowly selected population.

METHODS

SHERPA-MAGIC is an investigator-driven, multicenter, prospective, single-arm study that enrolled patients undergoing BRS coronary implantation in 18 Italian centers. The present analysis considered the first 543 enrolled patients treated with RMS, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The study protocol included strict criteria for patient selection and standardization of RMS implantation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of the vessel-oriented composite endpoints (VOCE), including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

Overall, 635 vessels were treated. The 1-year cumulative occurrence of VOCE was 22 (3.5%, 95% CI 2.2%-5.2%), which was significantly lower than the prespecified estimation (from 5.5% to 8.5%). At the median follow-up of 3.5 [2.6-4.3] years, there were 3 (0.5%) cardiac deaths, 12 (1.9%) target vessel myocardial infarctions, and 33 (5.2%) ischemia-driven target vessel revascularizations. A total of 37 (5.8%, 95%CI 4.1%-7.9%) VOCEs were detected. Scaffold thrombosis occurred in 4 (0.6%, 95%CI 0.1%-1.6%) cases. Patient-level analysis confirmed the findings of the vessel-level analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the safety and performance of RMS technology. If confirmed in randomized controlled trials, they may rekindle interest in the use of scaffolds in daily practice.

摘要

背景

可吸收镁支架(RMS)是第二代生物可吸收支架(BRS),在之前的研究中结果不一。这些结果表明,患者选择和植入技术可能对临床结果有影响。本研究旨在窄范围选择人群中研究 RMS 的安全性和长期疗效。

方法

SHERPA-MAGIC 是一项由研究者驱动、多中心、前瞻性、单臂研究,在意大利的 18 个中心纳入接受 BRS 冠状动脉植入的患者。本分析考虑了前 543 例接受 RMS 治疗的患者,最低随访 1 年。研究方案包括严格的患者选择标准和 RMS 植入标准化。主要终点是血管定向复合终点(VOCE)的发生,包括心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建。

结果

共治疗 635 支血管。1 年时 VOCE 的累计发生率为 22 例(3.5%,95%CI 2.2%-5.2%),明显低于预设估计值(5.5%-8.5%)。中位随访 3.5 [2.6-4.3]年后,发生 3 例心源性死亡(0.5%,95%CI 0.1%-1.6%)、12 例靶血管心肌梗死(1.9%)和 33 例缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建(5.2%)。共检测到 37 例 VOCE(5.8%,95%CI 4.1%-7.9%)。支架血栓形成 4 例(0.6%,95%CI 0.1%-1.6%)。患者水平分析证实了血管水平分析的结果。

结论

这些结果证实了 RMS 技术的安全性和性能。如果在随机对照试验中得到证实,它们可能会重新激发人们对支架在日常实践中应用的兴趣。