Suppr超能文献

教育者主导的身体素养和活动干预的系统评价

A Systematic Review of Educator-Led Physical Literacy and Activity Interventions.

机构信息

School of Exercise Science, Physical & Health Education, Faculty of Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; Institute on Aging & Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

School of Kinesiology, Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2023 May;64(5):742-760. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.01.010.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early childhood is a key time for the development of physical activity behaviors and physical literacy. A growing proportion of children spend a significant portion of their daytime in early childhood education and care settings where an early childhood educator cares for them. This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42018087249) aimed to identify the differences between effective and noneffective educator-led interventions with a goal to improve physical literacy and/or physical activity in children aged 3-5 years in early childhood education and care settings.

METHODS

Interventions were included if they aimed to improve at least 1 physical literacy component or physical activity time in children aged 2-6 years through educator training. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC, Australian Education Index, and Sport Discus were searched in March 2018 and April 2021. Risk of bias was assessed through a modified Cochrane assessment tool.

RESULTS

Data from 51 studies were analyzed in 2021 and 2022 and summarized narratively. Thirty-seven interventions aimed to promote physical activity, and 28 sought to promote physical literacy; 54% and 63% of these were effective, respectively. Interventions that were underpinned by theory, included ongoing support, or measured intervention fidelity were more effective, especially when all 3 were done.

DISCUSSION

This review was limited by a high risk of bias and inconsistency in reporting results across interventions. Reporting physical activity by minutes per hour and reporting both sub and total scores in physical literacy assessments will allow for greater cross-comparison between trials. Future training of educators should be underpinned by theory and incorporate ongoing support and objective fidelity checks.

摘要

简介

儿童早期是发展身体活动行为和身体素养的关键时期。越来越多的儿童在幼儿教育和照护环境中度过大量的白天时间,在这些环境中,幼儿教育工作者照顾他们。本系统评价(PROSPERO CRD42018087249)旨在确定具有改善 3-5 岁儿童身体素养和/或身体活动目标的有效和无效教育者主导干预措施之间的差异,这些干预措施在幼儿教育和照护环境中进行。

方法

如果干预措施旨在通过教育者培训提高 2-6 岁儿童至少 1 个身体素养成分或身体活动时间,则将其纳入研究。2018 年 3 月和 2021 年 4 月在 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、ERIC、澳大利亚教育索引和 Sport Discus 中进行了检索。通过改良的 Cochrane 评估工具评估了偏倚风险。

结果

2021 年和 2022 年对 51 项研究的数据进行了分析,并进行了叙述性总结。37 项干预措施旨在促进身体活动,28 项旨在促进身体素养;分别有 54%和 63%的干预措施是有效的。以理论为基础、提供持续支持或测量干预一致性的干预措施更有效,尤其是当这 3 项都完成时。

讨论

本综述受到偏倚风险高和干预措施之间结果报告不一致的限制。按每小时分钟报告身体活动,并报告身体素养评估中的分项和总分,将允许在试验之间进行更好的比较。未来教育者的培训应以理论为基础,纳入持续支持和客观的一致性检查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验