Cannon Jeffrey W, Wyber Rosemary
Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
NPJ Vaccines. 2023 Apr 22;8(1):59. doi: 10.1038/s41541-023-00649-3.
Infection by group A Streptococcus (Strep A) results in a diverse range of clinical conditions, including pharyngitis, impetigo, cellulitis, necrotising fasciitis, and rheumatic heart disease. In this article, we outline the recommended strategies for Strep A treatment and prevention and review the literature for economic evaluations of competing treatment and prevention strategies. We find that most economic evaluations focus on reducing the duration of illness or risk of rheumatic fever among people presenting with sore throat through diagnostic and/or treatment strategies. Few studies have evaluated strategies to reduce the burden of Strep A infection among the general population, nor have they considered the local capacity to finance and implement strategies. Evaluation of validated costs and consequences for a more diverse range of Strep A interventions are needed to ensure policies maximise patient outcomes under budget constraints. This should include attention to basic public health strategies and emerging strategies such as vaccination.
A组链球菌(A群链球菌)感染会导致多种临床病症,包括咽炎、脓疱病、蜂窝织炎、坏死性筋膜炎和风湿性心脏病。在本文中,我们概述了A群链球菌治疗和预防的推荐策略,并回顾了关于相互竞争的治疗和预防策略的经济学评估文献。我们发现,大多数经济学评估聚焦于通过诊断和/或治疗策略来缩短咽痛患者的病程或降低风湿热风险。很少有研究评估在普通人群中减轻A群链球菌感染负担的策略,也没有考虑当地资助和实施这些策略的能力。需要对更多种类的A群链球菌干预措施的有效成本和后果进行评估,以确保政策在预算限制下能使患者受益最大化。这应包括关注基本公共卫生策略以及诸如疫苗接种等新兴策略。