Division of Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Clin Gerontol. 2024 Oct-Dec;47(5):988-995. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2023.2205847. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
Currently, there is a growing interest on the benefits of volunteering. Nevertheless, there is scarce evidence for non-volunteering altruistic behaviors. This study aims to investigate the role of both altruism and volunteering on the cognitive performance of older individuals followed for four years.
This was cohort study carried out in 180 Brazilian older adults assessed in three different timepoints (baseline [2015-2016], 2 years of follow-up [2017-2018] and 4 years of follow-up [2019-2020]). Composite cognitive score was calculated based on the Mini-Mental State Examination, Verbal Fluency, Clock-Drawing test, and CERAD Word-List. Altruism was assessed through the Self-reported Altruism Scale and self-reported volunteering status. Mixed ANCOVAS were performed.
For altruism, there were significant differences in all time points (Baseline, 2 years and 4 years) favoring higher cognitive scores for higher levels of altruism. However, no differences were observed for volunteering in all time points.
Having higher levels of altruism was significantly associated with better cognitive scores.
Altruism, even without volunteering, seem to have positive effects on the cognitive functioning of older adults. Health professionals who take care of older adults might take account of the presence or absence of altruistic behaviors of their patients in their formulations and recommendations.
目前,人们对志愿服务的好处越来越感兴趣。然而,关于非志愿利他行为的证据很少。本研究旨在调查利他主义和志愿服务对 180 名巴西老年人认知表现的四年随访结果的作用。
这是一项队列研究,共纳入 180 名巴西老年人,在三个不同时间点(基线[2015-2016 年]、2 年随访[2017-2018 年]和 4 年随访[2019-2020 年])进行评估。采用简易精神状态检查、词语流畅性、画钟试验和 CERAD 单词列表计算综合认知评分。通过自我报告利他量表和自我报告的志愿服务状况评估利他主义。采用混合方差分析进行分析。
在所有时间点(基线、2 年和 4 年),利他主义均存在显著差异,较高的利他主义水平与较高的认知评分相关。然而,在所有时间点,志愿服务均无差异。
较高的利他主义水平与更好的认知评分显著相关。
即使没有志愿服务,利他主义似乎对老年人的认知功能也有积极影响。照顾老年人的健康专业人员在制定和建议时,可以考虑患者是否存在利他行为。