• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发门诊认知行为治疗中跨诊断类内化障碍预后指标。

Developing Transdiagnostic Internalizing Disorder Prognostic Indices for Outpatient Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.

机构信息

Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University.

Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2023 May;54(3):461-475. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2022.11.004
PMID:37088504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10126479/
Abstract

A growing literature is devoted to understanding and predicting heterogeneity in response to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), including using supervised machine learning to develop prognostic models that could be used to inform treatment planning. The current study developed CBT prognostic models using data from a broad dimensionally oriented pretreatment assessment (324 predictors) of 1,210 outpatients with internalizing psychopathology. Super learning was implemented to develop prognostic indices for three outcomes assessed at 12-month follow-up: principal diagnosis improvement (attained by 65.8% of patients), principal diagnosis remission (56.8%), and transdiagnostic full remission (14.3%). The models for principal diagnosis remission and transdiagnostic remission performed best (AUROCs = 0.71-0.73). Calibration was modest for all three models. Three-quarters (77.3%) of patients in the top tertile of the predicted probability distribution achieved principal diagnosis remission, compared to 35.0% in the bottom tertile. One-third (35.3%) of patients in the top two deciles of predicted probabilities for transdiagnostic complete remission achieved this outcome, compared to 2.7% in the bottom tertile. Key predictors included principal diagnosis severity, social anxiety diagnosis/severity, hopelessness, temperament, and global impairment. While additional work is needed to improve performance, integration of CBT prognostic models ultimately could lead to more effective and efficient treatment of patients with internalizing psychopathology.

摘要

越来越多的文献致力于理解和预测认知行为疗法(CBT)的反应异质性,包括使用监督机器学习来开发预后模型,以便为治疗计划提供信息。本研究使用 1210 名有内化性精神病理学的门诊患者的广泛维度定向预处理评估(324 个预测因子)的数据开发了 CBT 预后模型。采用超级学习方法为三种预后结局制定了预测指标,这些结局是在 12 个月的随访中评估的:主要诊断改善(65.8%的患者达到)、主要诊断缓解(56.8%)和跨诊断完全缓解(14.3%)。主要诊断缓解和跨诊断缓解模型的性能最佳(AUROC 值为 0.71-0.73)。所有三种模型的校准效果都比较适度。与底部三分位数的 35.0%相比,预测概率分布前三分位数的 77.3%的患者达到主要诊断缓解。与底部三分位数的 2.7%相比,预测跨诊断完全缓解概率前两十分位数的 35.3%的患者达到该结果。主要预测因子包括主要诊断严重程度、社交焦虑症诊断/严重程度、绝望感、气质和整体受损。虽然还需要进一步的工作来提高性能,但 CBT 预后模型的整合最终可能会导致更有效和更高效地治疗有内化性精神病理学的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6901/10126479/c67e0a1d8b0b/nihms-1855967-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6901/10126479/2b8ca83867f2/nihms-1855967-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6901/10126479/2e6e4d39b94a/nihms-1855967-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6901/10126479/c67e0a1d8b0b/nihms-1855967-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6901/10126479/2b8ca83867f2/nihms-1855967-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6901/10126479/2e6e4d39b94a/nihms-1855967-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6901/10126479/c67e0a1d8b0b/nihms-1855967-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing Transdiagnostic Internalizing Disorder Prognostic Indices for Outpatient Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.开发门诊认知行为治疗中跨诊断类内化障碍预后指标。
Behav Ther. 2023 May;54(3):461-475. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
2
Prognostic value of rapid response to enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy in a routine clinic sample of eating disorder outpatients.常规临床门诊进食障碍患者中,对强化认知行为治疗快速反应的预后价值。
Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Dec;46(8):764-70. doi: 10.1002/eat.22169. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
3
Predictors of treatment outcome for the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in children (UP-C).预测儿童情绪障碍跨诊断统一治疗方案(UP-C)治疗结果的因素。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Jun;57:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.05.004.
4
Clinical Predictors of Response to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: The Genes for Treatment (GxT) Study.儿童焦虑症认知行为疗法反应的临床预测因素:治疗基因(GxT)研究
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;54(6):454-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Prospective relations between anxiety sensitivity and transdiagnostic anxiety following cognitive-behavioral therapy: Evidence from the Coordinated Anxiety Learning management trial.前瞻性焦虑敏感与认知行为治疗后广泛性焦虑障碍的关系:来自协调焦虑学习管理试验的证据。
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Aug;155:104119. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104119. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Transdiagnostic versus diagnosis-specific cbt for anxiety disorders: a preliminary randomized controlled noninferiority trial.广泛性焦虑障碍的跨诊断与诊断特异性认知行为治疗比较:一项初步的随机对照非劣效性试验。
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Oct;29(10):874-82. doi: 10.1002/da.21974. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
7
Predictors of treatment outcome in an effectiveness trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for children with anxiety disorders.焦虑障碍儿童认知行为治疗效果试验的治疗结果预测因素。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Jan;76:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
8
A transdiagnostic comparison of enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT-E) and interpersonal psychotherapy in the treatment of eating disorders.强化认知行为疗法(CBT-E)与人际心理治疗在饮食失调治疗中的跨诊断比较
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Jul;70:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
9
Identifying CBT non-response among OCD outpatients: A machine-learning approach.识别强迫症门诊患者中认知行为疗法无反应者:一种机器学习方法。
Psychother Res. 2021 Jan;31(1):52-62. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1839140. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Is Activation the Active Ingredient of Transdiagnostic Therapies? A Randomized Clinical Trial of Behavioral Activation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Emotional Disorders.是激活还是活性成分?情绪障碍的行为激活、接纳与承诺疗法和跨诊断认知行为疗法的随机临床试验。
Behav Modif. 2023 Jan;47(1):3-45. doi: 10.1177/01454455221083309. Epub 2022 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting treatment response to cognitive behavior therapy in social anxiety disorder on the basis of demographics, psychiatric history, and scales: A machine learning approach.基于人口统计学、精神病史和量表预测社交焦虑障碍认知行为疗法的治疗反应:一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0313351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313351. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Pragmatic Precision Psychiatry-A New Direction for Optimizing Treatment Selection.实用精准精神病学:优化治疗选择的新方向。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 1;78(12):1384-1390. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2500.
2
The contribution of depressive 'disorder characteristics' to determinations of prognosis for adults with depression: an individual patient data meta-analysis.抑郁“障碍特征”对成年抑郁症患者预后判断的影响:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2021 May;51(7):1068-1081. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001367. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
3
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Predictors of Treatment Outcome in a Quasi-Naturalistic Setting.
社交焦虑障碍的认知行为疗法:准自然主义环境下治疗结果的预测因素
Behav Ther. 2021 Mar;52(2):465-477. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Is social support pre-treatment associated with prognosis for adults with depression in primary care?社会支持在初级保健中与成年人抑郁症的预后有关吗?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 May;143(5):392-405. doi: 10.1111/acps.13285. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
5
Identifying CBT non-response among OCD outpatients: A machine-learning approach.识别强迫症门诊患者中认知行为疗法无反应者:一种机器学习方法。
Psychother Res. 2021 Jan;31(1):52-62. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1839140. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
6
The clinical characterization of the adult patient with depression aimed at personalization of management.针对成年抑郁症患者的临床特征进行个性化管理。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):269-293. doi: 10.1002/wps.20771.
7
Personalized treatment selection in routine care: Integrating machine learning and statistical algorithms to recommend cognitive behavioral or psychodynamic therapy.常规护理中的个性化治疗选择:整合机器学习和统计算法以推荐认知行为疗法或心理动力疗法。
Psychother Res. 2021 Jan;31(1):33-51. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1769219. Epub 2020 May 28.
8
Beyond the Constraints of an RCT: Naturalistic Treatment Outcomes for Anxiety-Related Disorders.超越 RCT 的限制:与焦虑相关障碍的自然治疗结果。
Behav Ther. 2020 May;51(3):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
9
Predicting cognitive behavioral therapy outcome in the outpatient sector based on clinical routine data: A machine learning approach.基于临床常规数据预测门诊患者认知行为治疗的疗效:一种机器学习方法。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Jan;124:103530. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103530. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics.校准:预测分析的阿喀琉斯之踵。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7.