Suppr超能文献

身心疗法对妇科癌症女性的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Effectiveness of Mind-Body Therapies for Women With Gynecological Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Alice Lee Center for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (Mss J. W. Ong and Q.-E. O. Ong, and Dr He); and Division of Nursing, KK Women's and Children's Hospital (Mss J. W. Ong, Q.-E. O. Ong, and Tian), Singapore; Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland (Ms Metsävainio); Kuopio University Hospital, Finland (Dr Vaajoki); and National University Health System (Dr He), Singapore.

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2024;47(6):460-470. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001231. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mind-body therapies (MBTs) have gained popularity among patients with cancer as a supportive therapy. To date, no systematic reviews have assessed the effect of MBTs on the health outcomes in women with gynecological cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the effectiveness of MBTs on quality of life, anxiety, depression, cancer-related pain, and fatigue among women with gynecological cancer.

METHODS

We searched and screened randomized controlled trials in 7 databases, trial registries, and gray literature from the databases' inception to December 2021. Data were extracted from eligible studies, with each study's quality assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.4. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed. The quality of evidence across the studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Nine trials were included. Statistically significant effects of MBTs on depression (standardized mean difference, -0.56; 95% confidence interval, -1.01 to -0.11; P = .01), pain (standardized mean difference, -1.60; 95% confidence interval, -3.14 to -0.07; P = .04), and fatigue (standardized mean difference, -1.17; 95% confidence interval, -2.16 to -0.18; P = .02) were observed, but not on quality of life and anxiety. The quality of evidence was low due to the high risks of bias and high heterogeneity among the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Mind-body therapies were effective in reducing depression, pain, and fatigue of women with gynecological cancer. However, the low quality of the evidence implies the need for more future studies with better methodologies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Mind-body therapies may be used as an additional strategy to help manage depressive mood, pain, and fatigue among women with gynecological cancer.

摘要

背景

身心疗法(MBTs)作为一种支持性疗法,在癌症患者中越来越受欢迎。迄今为止,尚无系统评价评估 MBTs 对妇科癌症患者健康结局的影响。

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在综合评估 MBTs 对妇科癌症患者生活质量、焦虑、抑郁、癌症相关疼痛和疲劳的影响。

方法

我们在 7 个数据库、试验注册处和数据库创建以来的灰色文献中进行了搜索和筛选随机对照试验。从合格研究中提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估每个研究的质量。使用 RevMan 5.4 进行荟萃分析。进行敏感性和亚组分析。使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法评估研究间证据质量。

结果

纳入 9 项试验。MBTs 在抑郁(标准化均数差,-0.56;95%置信区间,-1.01 至 -0.11;P =.01)、疼痛(标准化均数差,-1.60;95%置信区间,-3.14 至 -0.07;P =.04)和疲劳(标准化均数差,-1.17;95%置信区间,-2.16 至 -0.18;P =.02)方面具有统计学意义的效果,但对生活质量和焦虑没有影响。由于研究中存在较高的偏倚风险和高度异质性,证据质量较低。

结论

身心疗法可有效减轻妇科癌症患者的抑郁、疼痛和疲劳。然而,证据质量低表明需要更多未来研究采用更好的方法。

意义

身心疗法可能被用作帮助管理妇科癌症患者抑郁情绪、疼痛和疲劳的附加策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验