• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Letters of Recommendation for PCCM Fellowship Applicants: Counting Words Is Just the Beginning. Reply to: More than Words? Looking for Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation.

作者信息

Viglianti Elizabeth M, Byrd Kaitland M, Sheffield Virginia, Oliverio Andrea L

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care.

Institute of Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

ATS Sch. 2023 Mar 30;4(1):104-106. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0129LE. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0129LE
PMID:37089677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10117424/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Letters of Recommendation for PCCM Fellowship Applicants: Counting Words Is Just the Beginning. Reply to: More than Words? Looking for Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation.肺、重症医学专科培训项目申请人推荐信：计算字数只是开始。回复：不止于文字？探寻推荐信中的性别偏见
ATS Sch. 2023 Mar 30;4(1):104-106. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0129LE. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Evaluating Language Characteristics and Related Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Hand Surgery Fellowship.评估手外科学 Fellowship 推荐信中的语言特点和相关性别偏见。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Aug;49(8):801.e1-801.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
3
Differences in international medical graduates' letters of recommendation by gender in pulmonary and critical care medicine: a cohort analysis.国际医学毕业生在肺科和重症监护医学推荐信中存在的性别差异：队列分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04042-5.
4
The Impact of Applicant Sex on Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Letters of Recommendation: A Multisite Study.申请人性别对肺科与重症医学专科住院医师推荐信的影响：一项多中心研究
ATS Sch. 2025 Mar;6(1):65-73. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0074OC. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
5
Linguistic analysis of letters of recommendation for pediatric otolaryngology: A pilot study.推荐信的语言学分析：小儿耳鼻喉科的初步研究。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;186:112121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112121. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
6
Are There Gender-based Differences in Language in Letters of Recommendation to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program?推荐信中的语言是否存在性别差异？——以骨科住院医师项目为例
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1400-1408. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001053.
7
Do gender differences exist in letters of recommendation for reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship?推荐信中是否存在生殖内分泌与不孕不育研究员项目的性别差异？
Fertil Steril. 2023 Dec;120(6):1234-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.09.018. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Gender Bias in Surgical Oncology Fellowship Recommendation Letters: Gaining Progress.外科肿瘤学研究员推荐函中的性别偏见：取得进展。
J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun;78(3):866-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.049. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Cardiothoracic Surgery Applicants.心胸外科手术申请者推荐信中的性别偏见
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2023 Aug 9;1(4):696-700. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2023.07.007. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Gender bias in colorectal surgery fellowship letters of recommendation.结直肠外科住院医师培训推荐信中的性别偏见。
Am J Surg. 2024 Jan;227:198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.019. Epub 2023 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Gendered Language in Letters of Recommendation for Applicants to Pulmonary Critical Care Fellowships.肺重症监护 fellowship 申请者推荐信中的性别化语言。
ATS Sch. 2022 Aug 22;3(3):413-424. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0004OC. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Linguistic Biases in Letters of Recommendation for Radiation Oncology Residency Applicants from 2015 to 2019.2015 年至 2019 年放射肿瘤学住院医师申请人推荐信中的语言偏见。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Aug;37(4):965-972. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01907-x. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use.研究中的性别平等：SAGER 指南的基本原理及推荐用法。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 May 3;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6. eCollection 2016.
4
The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature--a 35-year perspective.学术医学文献作者身份中的“性别差距”——35年的视角
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):281-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa053910.
5
Reliability in evaluating letters of recommendation.推荐信评估的可靠性。
Acad Med. 2000 Oct;75(10):1029. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200010000-00022.
6
Letters of recommendation for surgical residencies: what they say and what they mean.外科住院医师推荐信：其内容及含义
J Surg Res. 1994 Feb;56(2):192-8. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1994.1031.