Petscher Yaacov, Al Otaiba Stephanie, Wanzek Jeanne
Florida State University.
Southern Methodist University.
J Psychoeduc Assess. 2021 Feb;39(1):74-88. doi: 10.1177/0734282920943456. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
This study explored the underlying latent structure of items on the Mindset Assessment Profile (MAP) tool, explore whether subgroups of students exist based on the latent structure of MAP items, and test whether subgroups were differentiated on standardized measures of reading comprehension, vocabulary, and word reading. Participants included 431 fourth grade students. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a three-factor model provided the most parsimonious fit to the data. Results of exploratory finite mixture model analysis with auxiliary regression suggested five classes of students with the students categorized as Growth Mindset - High Effort profile, having the highest, observed reading comprehension ( = 451.98, SD = 38.88) and vocabulary ( = 454.37, SD = 34.74) scores. By contrast, students categorized as Fixed Mindset - Higher Effort had the lowest observed reading comprehension and vocabulary scores. Limitations and directions for future research, and implications for using MAP assessment to inform intervention are discussed.
本研究探讨了思维模式评估量表(MAP)工具中项目的潜在结构,探究基于MAP项目的潜在结构是否存在学生亚组,并测试这些亚组在阅读理解、词汇和单词阅读的标准化测量上是否存在差异。参与者包括431名四年级学生。验证性因素分析表明,三因素模型对数据的拟合最为简约。探索性有限混合模型分析及辅助回归的结果表明存在五类学生,其中被归类为成长型思维 - 高努力型的学生,其阅读理解(= 451.98,标准差 = 38.88)和词汇(= 454.37,标准差 = 34.74)得分最高。相比之下,被归类为固定型思维 - 更高努力型的学生,其阅读理解和词汇得分最低。讨论了研究的局限性、未来研究方向以及使用MAP评估为干预提供信息的意义。