• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察有显著阅读理解困难学生的阅读和认知概况。

Examining the Reading and Cognitive Profiles of Students With Significant Reading Comprehension Difficulties.

作者信息

Capin Philip, Cho Eunsoo, Miciak Jeremy, Roberts Greg, Vaughn Sharon

机构信息

The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.

出版信息

Learn Disabil Q. 2021 Aug;44(3):183-196. doi: 10.1177/0731948721989973. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1177/0731948721989973
PMID:35418724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9004597/
Abstract

This study investigated the word reading and listening comprehension difficulties of fourth-grade students with significant reading comprehension deficits and the cognitive difficulties that underlie these weaknesses. Latent profile analysis was used to classify a sample of fourth-grade students ( = 446) who scored below the 16th percentile on a measure of reading comprehension into subgroups based on their performance in word reading (WR) and listening comprehension (LC). Three latent profiles emerged: (a) moderate deficits in both WR and LC of similar severity (91%), (b) severe deficit in WR paired with moderate LC deficit (5%), and (c) severe deficit in LC with moderate WR difficulties (4%). Analyses examining the associations between cognitive attributes and group membership indicated students with lower performance on cognitive predictors were more likely to be in a severe subgroup. Implications for educators targeting improved reading performance for upper elementary students with significant reading difficulties were discussed.

摘要

本研究调查了阅读理解能力存在显著缺陷的四年级学生在单词阅读和听力理解方面的困难,以及构成这些弱点的认知困难。潜在剖面分析用于根据四年级学生(n = 446)在单词阅读(WR)和听力理解(LC)方面的表现,将在阅读理解测试中得分低于第16百分位的样本分为不同亚组。出现了三种潜在剖面:(a)WR和LC均存在中等程度且严重程度相似的缺陷(91%),(b)WR存在严重缺陷且LC存在中等程度缺陷(5%),以及(c)LC存在严重缺陷且WR存在中等程度困难(4%)。检验认知属性与亚组成员关系的分析表明,在认知预测指标上表现较差的学生更有可能属于严重亚组。讨论了针对阅读困难较大的高年级小学生提高阅读成绩的教育启示。

相似文献

1
Examining the Reading and Cognitive Profiles of Students With Significant Reading Comprehension Difficulties.考察有显著阅读理解困难学生的阅读和认知概况。
Learn Disabil Q. 2021 Aug;44(3):183-196. doi: 10.1177/0731948721989973. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Understanding the nature and severity of reading difficulties among students with language and reading comprehension difficulties.了解语言和阅读理解困难学生的阅读困难的性质和严重程度。
Ann Dyslexia. 2022 Jul;72(2):249-275. doi: 10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3. Epub 2022 May 7.
3
Investigating the Reading Profiles of Middle School Emergent Bilinguals with Significant Reading Comprehension Difficulties.调查有显著阅读理解困难的中学初双语者的阅读概况。
Sci Stud Read. 2024;28(2):190-213. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2023.2254871. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
4
Heterogeneity in children's reading comprehension difficulties: A latent class approach.儿童阅读理解困难的异质性:一种潜在类别分析方法。
JCPP Adv. 2023 Jun 5;3(4):e12177. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12177. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Reading profiles in secondary school: concurrent language and cognitive abilities, and retrospective and prospective reading skills.中学阅读概况:并发语言和认知能力,以及回顾性和前瞻性阅读技能。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 19;14:1287134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287134. eCollection 2023.
6
How Initial Word Reading and Language Skills Affect Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Students With Reading Difficulties.初始单词阅读和语言技能如何影响阅读困难学生的阅读理解结果。
Except Child. 2019 Jan;85(2):180-196. doi: 10.1177/0014402918782618. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
7
Examining Sources and Mechanisms of Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Comparing English Learners and Non-English Learners within the Simple View of Reading.探究阅读理解困难的根源与机制:在阅读简单模型中比较英语学习者与非英语学习者
J Educ Psychol. 2019 Aug;111(6):982-1000. doi: 10.1037/edu0000332. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
8
The Importance of Baseline Word Reading Skills in Examining Student Response to a Multicomponent Reading Intervention.基线单词阅读技能在考察学生对多成分阅读干预的反应中的重要性。
J Learn Disabil. 2022 Jul-Aug;55(4):259-271. doi: 10.1177/00222194211010349. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
The Critical Role of Word Reading as a Predictor of Response to Intervention.阅读能力对干预反应的关键作用。
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Nov/Dec;53(6):415-427. doi: 10.1177/0022219419891412. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
10
Developmental profiles of reading fluency and reading comprehension from grades 1 to 9 and their early identification.从 1 年级到 9 年级的阅读流畅性和阅读理解的发展轨迹及其早期识别。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Nov;57(11):1840-1854. doi: 10.1037/dev0000976.

引用本文的文献

1
FMRI activation during paragraph reading in pediatric epilepsy.小儿癫痫患者段落阅读过程中的功能磁共振成像激活情况
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 May;166:110341. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110341. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Relations Between Executive Functions and Reading Comprehension: A Study of Fourth-Grade Students with and Without Reading Comprehension Difficulties.执行功能与阅读理解之间的关系:一项针对有和没有阅读理解困难的四年级学生的研究。
Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 23;14(12):1174. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121174.
3
Examining the Heterogeneous Early Literacy Profiles of First-Grade Students Who Are English Learners.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Sources and Mechanisms of Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Comparing English Learners and Non-English Learners within the Simple View of Reading.探究阅读理解困难的根源与机制:在阅读简单模型中比较英语学习者与非英语学习者
J Educ Psychol. 2019 Aug;111(6):982-1000. doi: 10.1037/edu0000332. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
2
How Initial Word Reading and Language Skills Affect Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Students With Reading Difficulties.初始单词阅读和语言技能如何影响阅读困难学生的阅读理解结果。
Except Child. 2019 Jan;85(2):180-196. doi: 10.1177/0014402918782618. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
3
Current Evidence on the Effects of Intensive Early Reading Interventions.
审视英语学习者一年级学生的异质早期读写能力概况。
Read Writ. 2024 Oct;37(8):1931-1953. doi: 10.1007/s11145-023-10452-0. Epub 2023 May 28.
4
Evidence-Based Reading Instruction for Secondary Students With Reading Difficulties Within Multitiered Systems of Support.针对多层支持系统中阅读困难的中学生的循证阅读教学
Teach Except Child. 2024 May-Jun;56(5):370-385. doi: 10.1177/00400599221079643. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Latent profiles as predictors of response to instruction for students with reading difficulties.潜在特征作为阅读困难学生对教学反应的预测指标
J Educ Psychol. 2024 Apr;116(3):363-376. doi: 10.1037/edu0000832. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
Investigating the Reading Profiles of Middle School Emergent Bilinguals with Significant Reading Comprehension Difficulties.调查有显著阅读理解困难的中学初双语者的阅读概况。
Sci Stud Read. 2024;28(2):190-213. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2023.2254871. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
7
Towards a dynamic, comprehensive conceptualization of dyslexia.朝向一个动态的、全面的阅读障碍概念化。
Ann Dyslexia. 2024 Oct;74(3):303-324. doi: 10.1007/s11881-023-00297-1. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
8
Heterogeneity in Reading Achievement and Mindset of Readers with Reading Difficulties.阅读困难读者在阅读成绩和思维模式上的异质性。
Read Writ. 2023 Jan;36(1):1-28. doi: 10.1007/s11145-022-10296-0. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
9
Exploring reading profiles of rural school students.探究农村学生的阅读特点。
Ann Dyslexia. 2023 Jul;73(2):235-259. doi: 10.1007/s11881-022-00276-y. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
10
A meta-analysis of the effects of academic interventions on academic achievement and academic anxiety outcomes in elementary school children.一项元分析,探讨了学术干预对小学生学业成绩和学业焦虑结果的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Jun;92:265-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
当前关于强化早期阅读干预效果的证据。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Nov/Dec;51(6):612-624. doi: 10.1177/0022219418775110. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Effects From a Randomized Control Trial Comparing Researcher and School-Implemented Treatments With Fourth Graders With Significant Reading Difficulties.一项随机对照试验的效果:比较研究人员实施的治疗和学校实施的治疗对有严重阅读困难的四年级学生的影响。
J Res Educ Eff. 2016;9(Suppl 1):23-44. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2015.1126386. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3.幼儿园至三年级二级阅读干预效果的荟萃分析
Educ Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;28(3):551-576. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
6
Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of "Far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review.工作记忆训练并不能提高智力测试或其他“远迁移”测试的成绩:一项元分析综述的证据
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):512-34. doi: 10.1177/1745691616635612.
7
Cognitive Attributes, Attention, and Self-Efficacy of Adequate and Inadequate Responders in a Fourth Grade Reading Intervention.四年级阅读干预中充分应答者与不充分应答者的认知属性、注意力及自我效能感
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2015 Nov 1;30(4):159-170. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12088. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
Meta-analysis of academic interventions derived from neuropsychological data.源自神经心理学数据的学术干预的荟萃分析。
Sch Psychol Q. 2016 Mar;31(1):28-42. doi: 10.1037/spq0000117. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
9
Patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses: Identification rates, agreement, and validity for learning disabilities identification.认知优势与劣势模式:学习障碍识别的识别率、一致性及效度
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Mar;29(1):21-37. doi: 10.1037/spq0000037. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Struggling Readers in Grades 4-12: 1980-2011.对4至12年级阅读困难学生干预措施的元分析:1980年至2011年
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Jul-Aug;48(4):369-90. doi: 10.1177/0022219413504995. Epub 2013 Oct 3.