Papageorgiou Christos, Tampakis Konstantinos, Chronopoulos Anastasios, Tzifos Vaios
Department of Interventional and Structural Cardiology, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens 115 26, Greece.
Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Cardiol Res. 2023 Apr;14(2):153-157. doi: 10.14740/cr1495. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
Transfemoral access has been established as the gold standard approach for the majority of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, in cases with anatomical difficulties or severely diffused peripheral arterial disease, alternative vascular access may be considered such as the transaxillary approach. We present the case of a 92-year-old gentleman with exertional dyspnea due to severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and a history of peripheral femoro-femoral bypass surgery, coronary arterial bypass surgery and a permanent dual-chamber left-side implanted pacemaker. Due to the high surgical risk and the severe anatomical difficulties, the method of TAVI using the left axillary approach was opted. A 14-F vascular sheath was inserted with surgical cutdown and with fluoroscopic guidance while small injections of contrast confirmed the non-occlusive position and the patency of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft. A stiff guidewire was used to cross the heavily calcified aortic valve and subsequently was placed into the left ventricle. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty was performed followed by a successful TAVI with no significant aortic regurgitation or paravalvular leak. The patient recuperated uneventfully and was discharged after 72 h. Axillary access for TAVI is a feasible option for high-risk patients with extended peripheral arteriopathy. To our knowledge this is the first case report describing the implantation of a newer type of intra-annular self-expanding valve platform in a nonagenarian patient with severe comorbidities and such a remarkable history of multiple previous interventions in the selected access site. Meticulous upfront strategy planning and efficient collaboration between specialties is of outmost importance in hybrid procedures for favorable clinical outcomes, especially in cases with challenging anatomies.
经股动脉入路已被确立为大多数接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者的金标准入路。然而,在存在解剖学困难或严重弥漫性外周动脉疾病的情况下,可考虑采用替代血管入路,如经腋动脉入路。我们报告一例92岁男性患者,因严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄出现劳力性呼吸困难,既往有股-股外周旁路手术、冠状动脉旁路手术史,且植入了永久性双腔左侧起搏器。由于手术风险高和严重的解剖学困难,选择了经左腋动脉入路进行TAVI。在手术切开并在透视引导下插入一根14F血管鞘,同时少量注射造影剂以确认左乳内动脉(LIMA)移植物的非闭塞位置和通畅性。使用硬导丝穿过严重钙化的主动脉瓣,随后将其置入左心室。进行了球囊主动脉瓣成形术,随后成功完成TAVI,无明显主动脉瓣反流或瓣周漏。患者恢复顺利,72小时后出院。对于患有广泛性外周动脉病变的高危患者,经腋动脉入路进行TAVI是一种可行的选择。据我们所知,这是第一例报告,描述了在一位患有严重合并症且在所选入路部位有如此显著多次既往干预史的非agenarian患者中植入新型瓣环内自膨式瓣膜平台。在混合手术中,精心的前期策略规划和各专科之间的高效协作对于取得良好临床结果至关重要,尤其是在解剖结构具有挑战性的病例中。