Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.
Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, 201318, China.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2023 Jun;248(11):991-1000. doi: 10.1177/15353702231160334. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
The impact of habitual physical activity on vagal-cardiac function and baroreflex sensitivity in elderly women is poorly characterized. This study compared vagal-cardiac modulation and carotid baroreflex (CBR) function in eight physically active (67.6 ± 1.9 years; peak O uptake 29.1 ± 2.5 mL/min/kg) versus eight sedentary (67.3 ± 1.8 years; peak O uptake 18.6 ± 0.9 mL/min/kg) elderly women. Heart rate (HR) variabilities and maximal changes of HR and mean arterial pressure (MAP) elicited by 5-s pressure pulses between +40 and -80 mmHg applied to the carotid sinus were measured at rest and during carotid baroreceptor unloading effected by -15 mmHg lower-body negative pressure (LBNP). HR variability was greater in active than sedentary women in both low (0.998 ± 0.286 versus 0.255 ± 0.063 bpm; = 0.036) and high (0.895 ± 0.301 versus 0.156 ± 0.045 bpm; = 0.044) frequency domains. CBR-HR gains (bpm/mmHg) were greater (fitness factor < 0.001) in active versus sedentary women at rest (-0.146 ± 0.014 versus -0.088 ± 0.011) and during LBNP (-0.105 ± 0.014 versus -0.065 ± 0.008). CBR-MAP gains (mmHg/mmHg) tended to be greater (fitness factor = 0.077) in active versus sedentary women at rest (-0.132 ± 0.013 versus -0.110 ± 0.011) and during LBNP (-0.129 ± 0.015 versus -0.113 ± 0.013). However, LBNP did not potentiate CBR-MAP gains in either sedentary or active women (LBNP factor = 0.94), and it depressed CBR-HR gains in both groups (LBNP factor = 0.003). CBR-HR gains in the sedentary women did not differ (sex factor = 0.65) from gains reported in age-matched sedentary men, although CBR-MAP gains tended to be greater (sex factor = 0.109) in the men. Thus, tonic vagal modulation indicated by HR variability and dynamic vagal responses assessed by CBR-HR gain were augmented in physically active women. Enhanced vagal-cardiac function may protect against senescence-associated cardiac electrical and hemodynamic instability in elderly women.
习惯性体力活动对老年女性迷走心脏功能和压力反射敏感性的影响特征描述不佳。本研究比较了 8 名体力活动(67.6±1.9 岁;峰值 O 摄取量 29.1±2.5mL/min/kg)与 8 名久坐(67.3±1.8 岁;峰值 O 摄取量 18.6±0.9mL/min/kg)老年女性的迷走心脏调节和颈动脉压力反射(CBR)功能。在休息时和通过 -15mmHg 下体负压(LBNP)对颈动脉窦施加的 5 秒压力脉冲期间,测量了心率(HR)变异性和 HR 的最大变化以及平均动脉压(MAP),压力脉冲的范围在+40 和-80mmHg 之间。在低(0.998±0.286 与 0.255±0.063bpm; = 0.036)和高(0.895±0.301 与 0.156±0.045bpm; = 0.044)频带中,活跃女性的 HR 变异性均大于久坐女性。与久坐女性相比,在休息时(-0.146±0.014 与 -0.088±0.011bpm; < 0.001)和 LBNP 时(-0.105±0.014 与 -0.065±0.008bpm; < 0.001),活跃女性的 CBR-HR 增益(bpm/mmHg)更大(适应因素 < 0.001)。与久坐女性相比,在休息时(-0.132±0.013 与 -0.110±0.011mmHg; = 0.077)和 LBNP 时(-0.129±0.015 与 -0.113±0.013mmHg; = 0.077),活跃女性的 CBR-MAP 增益(mmHg/mmHg)趋于更大(适应因素 = 0.077)。然而,LBNP 并没有增强久坐或活跃女性的 CBR-MAP 增益(LBNP 因素 = 0.94),并且它降低了两组的 CBR-HR 增益(LBNP 因素 = 0.003)。与年龄匹配的久坐男性相比,久坐女性的 CBR-HR 增益(性别因素 = 0.65)没有差异,尽管 CBR-MAP 增益(性别因素 = 0.109)在男性中趋于更大。因此,体力活动女性的 HR 变异性表示的紧张性迷走神经调节和 CBR-HR 增益评估的动态迷走神经反应得到增强。增强的迷走心脏功能可能有助于预防老年女性与衰老相关的心脏电和血流动力学不稳定。