School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1715-1728. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01426-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
The current research examined the naïve theories that individuals hold about how affect fades over time. In three studies (with various replications), participants read about positive and negative events and estimated the emotional impact of those events on either themselves or a hypothetical other over different time frames (i.e., 1 week, 1 month, 1 year-Studies 1a-1c) or how long it would take for specific amounts of fade to occur (Studies 2a & 2b). In a final study, participants were directly asked about their beliefs regarding affect fade. Results demonstrated that people have inaccurate expectations about affect fade for positive and negative events. Specifically, participants rate that positive events fade more in the short term, but that negative events fade more in the long term. Results are discussed in terms of how these (incorrect) naïve theories of affect fade relate to metacognitive biases in memory and emotion.
当前的研究考察了人们关于情感随时间消退的天真理论。在三项研究(有各种重复)中,参与者阅读了关于积极和消极事件的信息,并估计这些事件对自己或假设的他人在不同时间段(即 1 周、1 个月、1 年——研究 1a-1c)或特定消退量需要多长时间发生(研究 2a 和 2b)的情感影响。在最后一项研究中,直接询问参与者关于他们对情感消退的信念。结果表明,人们对积极和消极事件的情感消退有不准确的预期。具体来说,参与者认为积极事件在短期内消退得更多,而消极事件在长期内消退得更多。结果从记忆和情绪的元认知偏差的角度讨论了这些(不正确的)情感消退的天真理论。