Faculty of Education, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Physical Activity and Health Research Group (PaHerg), Research Institute of Hospital 12 de Octubre ('i+12'), Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Nov;23(11):2129-2138. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2207082. Epub 2023 May 9.
Evidence suggests that preterm birth is associated with an impaired physical fitness later in life, but whether these effects are already visible since early childhood remains unknown. We aimed to compare the physical fitness of preterm preschoolers with that of children born at term. Children aged three to six years and born preterm (<35 weeks) were recruited from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, and children born at term (>37 weeks) were included as controls. A variety of physical fitness indicators (strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, agility, flexibility and balance) were assessed with the PREFIT battery and the adapted sit and reach test. Physical activity levels were measured through the PrePAQ questionnaire. A total of 98 preterm children (gestational age 32.4 ± 2.3 weeks, age 5.1 ± 0.8 years) and 74 controls (gestational age 39.9 ± 1.0 weeks, age 4.8 ± 0.9 years) were analysed. Despite no significant differences in physical activity levels ( > 0.05), preterm children showed an overall poorer physical fitness compared to controls. Specifically, preterm children had an impaired handgrip strength (-13.95%, < 0.001), lower-limb muscle strength (-12.67%, = 0.003), agility (-14.9%, = 0.001), cardiorespiratory fitness (-12.73% = 0.005) and flexibility (-17.04%, = 0.001) compared to controls. An inverse dose-response association was observed between the level of prematurity and physical fitness, with very preterm children (gestational age ≤32 weeks) presenting the poorest fitness levels. In summary, prematurity seems to impair physical fitness since early childhood, which might support the need for promoting preventive strategies (e.g. fitness monitoring and applying exercise interventions). Preterm children present an impaired physical fitness compared with peers born at term since early childhood (3-6 years), as reflected by lower muscle strength, agility, flexibility and cardiorespiratory fitness.A greater impairment of physical fitness in observed in children born very preterm (≤32 weeks of gestation).These findings might support the implementation of preventive strategies (e.g. fitness monitoring and exercise training) in preterm children since early childhood.
证据表明,早产与儿童后期的身体健康状况受损有关,但这些影响是否早在儿童早期就已经显现仍不清楚。我们旨在比较早产儿和足月产儿童的身体素质。从新生儿重症监护病房招募了年龄在 3 至 6 岁且早产(<35 周)的儿童,并招募了足月产(>37 周)的儿童作为对照组。使用 PREFIT 电池和改良坐立伸展测试评估了各种身体素质指标(力量、心肺适能、敏捷性、柔韧性和平衡)。通过 PrePAQ 问卷测量了身体活动水平。共有 98 名早产儿(胎龄 32.4±2.3 周,年龄 5.1±0.8 岁)和 74 名对照组(胎龄 39.9±1.0 周,年龄 4.8±0.9 岁)进行了分析。尽管两组的身体活动水平没有显著差异(>0.05),但早产儿的身体素质总体上仍比对照组差。具体而言,早产儿的握力(-13.95%,<0.001)、下肢肌肉力量(-12.67%,=0.003)、敏捷性(-14.9%,=0.001)、心肺适能(-12.73%,=0.005)和柔韧性(-17.04%,=0.001)均低于对照组。早产程度与身体素质之间存在反比剂量反应关系,极早产儿(胎龄≤32 周)的身体素质水平最差。总之,早产似乎会影响儿童早期的身体素质,这可能支持需要采取预防策略(例如,监测身体素质和实施运动干预)。与足月产儿童相比,早产儿从幼儿期(3-6 岁)开始身体素质就较差,表现为肌肉力量、敏捷性、柔韧性和心肺适能较低。在极早产儿(胎龄≤32 周)中观察到身体素质的损害更大。这些发现可能支持在早产儿中实施预防策略(例如,身体素质监测和运动训练),以从幼儿期开始。