Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia.
Centre for Clinical Nursing, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia.
J Wound Care. 2023 May 2;32(5):292-300. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.5.292.
To investigate the effectiveness of an intensive nutrition intervention or use of wound healing supplements compared with standard nutritional care in pressure ulcer (PU) healing in hospitalised patients.
Adult patients with a Stage II or greater PU and predicted length of stay (LOS) of at least seven days were eligible for inclusion in this pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT). Patients with a PU were randomised to receive either: standard nutritional care (n=46); intensive nutritional care delivered by a dietitian (n=42); or standard care plus provision of a wound healing nutritional formula (n=43). Relevant nutritional and PU parameters were collected at baseline and then weekly or until discharge.
Of the 546 patients screened, 131 were included in the study. Participant mean age was 66.1±16.9 years, 75 (57.2%) were male and 50 (38.5%) were malnourished at recruitment. Median length of stay was 14 (IQR: 7-25) days and 62 (46.7%) had ≥2 PUs at the time of recruitment. Median change from baseline to day 14 in PU area was -0.75cm (IQR: -2.9_-0.03) and mean overall change in Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score was -2.9 (SD 3.2). Being in the nutrition intervention group was not a predictor of change in PUSH score, when adjusted for PU stage or location on recruitment (p=0.28); it was not a predictor of PU area at day 14, when adjusted for PU stage or area on recruitment (p=0.89) or PU stage and PUSH score on recruitment (p=0.91), nor a predictor of time to heal.
This study failed to confirm a significant positive impact on PU healing of use of an intensive nutrition intervention or wound healing supplements in hospitalised patients. Further research that focuses on practical mechanisms to meet protein and energy requirements is needed to guide practice.
调查强化营养干预或使用伤口愈合补充剂与标准营养护理相比,在促进住院患者压疮(PU)愈合方面的效果。
纳入本务实、多中心、随机对照试验(RCT)的患者为患有 II 期及以上 PU 且预计住院时间( LOS )至少为 7 天的成年患者。将 PU 患者随机分为接受以下治疗的组别:标准营养护理(n=46);营养师提供强化营养护理(n=42);或标准护理加提供伤口愈合营养配方(n=43)。在基线时以及之后每周或直至出院时收集相关营养和 PU 参数。
在筛选的 546 名患者中,有 131 名纳入了研究。参与者的平均年龄为 66.1±16.9 岁,75 名(57.2%)为男性,50 名(38.5%)在入组时存在营养不良。中位 LOS 为 14(IQR:7-25)天,有 62 名(46.7%)患者在入组时患有≥2 处 PU。从基线到第 14 天,PU 面积的中位数变化为-0.75cm(IQR:-2.9_-0.03),整体压疮愈合评分(PUSH)的平均变化为-2.9(SD 3.2)。在调整招募时的 PU 分期或位置后,营养干预组的 PUSH 评分变化无预测作用(p=0.28);在调整招募时的 PU 分期或面积后,对第 14 天的 PU 面积也无预测作用(p=0.89),或调整招募时的 PU 分期和 PUSH 评分后,对其也无预测作用(p=0.91),对愈合时间也无预测作用。
本研究未能证实强化营养干预或使用伤口愈合补充剂对住院患者 PU 愈合有显著的积极影响。需要进一步研究注重满足蛋白质和能量需求的实用机制,以指导实践。