Tay Amos Z E, Tang Po Yin, New Lee May, Zhang Xiaozhu, Leow Wei-Qiang
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Acad Pathol. 2023 Apr 11;10(2):100075. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100075. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
The SingHealth Pathology Residency Program (SHPRP) is a 5-year postgraduate training program in Singapore. We face the problem of resident attrition, which has a significant impact on the individual, program and healthcare providers. Our residents are regularly evaluated, using in-house evaluations as well as assessments required in our partnership with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education International (ACGME-I). We hence sought to determine if these assessments were able to distinguish residents who would attrite from residents who would graduate successfully. Retrospective analysis of existing residency assessments was performed on all residents who have separated from SHPRP and compared with residents currently in senior residency or graduated from the program. Statistical analysis was performed on quantitative assessment methods of Resident In-Service Examination (RISE), 360-degree feedback, faculty assessment, Milestones and our own annual departmental mock examination. Word frequency analysis of narrative feedback from faculty assessment was used to generate themes. Since 2011, 10 out of 34 residents have separated from the program. RISE, Milestone data and the departmental mock examination showed statistical significance in discriminating residents at risk of attrition for specialty-related reasons from successful residents. Analysis of narrative feedback showed that successful residents performed better in areas of organization, preparation with clinical history, application of knowledge, interpersonal communication and achieving sustained progress. Existing assessment methods used in our pathology residency program are effective in detecting residents at risk of attrition. This also suggests applications in the way that we select, assess and teach residents.
新加坡健康城病理住院医师培训项目(SHPRP)是一项为期5年的研究生培训项目。我们面临住院医师流失的问题,这对个人、项目和医疗服务提供者都有重大影响。我们的住院医师会定期接受评估,评估方式包括内部评估以及我们与国际毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME-I)合作所需的评估。因此,我们试图确定这些评估是否能够区分会流失住院医师和能够成功毕业的住院医师。对所有已从SHPRP结业的住院医师的现有住院医师评估进行回顾性分析,并与目前处于高级住院医师阶段或已从该项目毕业的住院医师进行比较。对住院医师在职考试(RISE)、360度反馈、教员评估、里程碑评估以及我们自己的年度部门模拟考试的定量评估方法进行了统计分析。利用教员评估中叙述性反馈的词频分析来生成主题。自2011年以来,34名住院医师中有10名已从该项目结业。RISE、里程碑数据和部门模拟考试在区分因专业相关原因有流失风险的住院医师和成功住院医师方面具有统计学意义。对叙述性反馈的分析表明,成功的住院医师在组织、临床病史准备、知识应用、人际沟通和取得持续进步等方面表现更好。我们病理住院医师培训项目中使用的现有评估方法在检测有流失风险的住院医师方面是有效的。这也为我们选拔、评估和教导住院医师的方式提供了应用方向。