Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
J Clin Pathol. 2020 Oct;73(10):642-647. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206345. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
A Delphi study to triangulate and determine the relative importance of the key qualities of trainees identified from qualitative interviews that sought to understand how consultant histopathologists determine diagnostic competences in trainees.
Twelve participants were purposively chosen for the Delphi to form an expert panel of relevant stakeholders. Participants were asked to score and rank the items presented to them.
A total of 22 out of 27 of the key qualities of trainees (items) reached 'consensus in' after round 2 suggesting participants were able to agree that the majority of the items identified in the qualitative interviews were important to diagnostic competence. Five items reached 'no consensus'. Participants did not suggest any additional items. Participants particularly valued qualities of reflection and professionalism and trainees who understood the process of reaching a diagnosis and how their pathological report could impact on patient care.
This study has triangulated findings from our qualitative interviews and show that consultants value a wide variety of qualities when determining diagnostic competence in their trainees. The judgement is complex and is therefore best assessed longitudinally and on a number of cases, so consultants can look for consistency of both approach to diagnosis and of trainee behaviour.
采用德尔菲法对从定性访谈中确定的培训生关键素质进行三角剖分和确定其相对重要性,这些定性访谈旨在了解顾问组织病理学家如何确定培训生的诊断能力。
为德尔菲法选择了 12 名参与者,以形成相关利益相关者的专家小组。要求参与者对提交给他们的项目进行评分和排序。
在第 2 轮之后,共有 27 项培训生关键素质(项目)中的 22 项达到了“共识”,这表明参与者能够同意在定性访谈中确定的大多数项目对诊断能力很重要。有 5 个项目未达成共识。参与者没有提出任何其他项目。参与者特别重视反思和专业精神等素质,以及那些理解诊断过程以及他们的病理报告如何影响患者护理的培训生。
本研究对我们的定性访谈结果进行了三角剖分,表明顾问在确定培训生的诊断能力时会重视各种各样的素质。这种判断是复杂的,因此最好进行纵向评估,并在多个案例中进行评估,以便顾问可以寻找诊断方法和培训生行为的一致性。