Tomita Hirofumi, Shimojima Naoki, Shimotakahara Akihiro, Tamada Ikkei, Ishikawa Miki, Hashimoto Makoto, Tsukizaki Ayano, Miyaguni Kazuaki, Hirobe Seiichi
Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 23;15(3):e36589. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36589. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The transumbilical approach is widely used for minimally invasive surgery in children. We compared herein the postoperative cosmesis between two types of transumbilical approach: a vertical incision versus periumbilical incision.
Patients with a transumbilical laparotomy before age one year were prospectively enrolled between January 2018 and December 2020. A vertical incision or periumbilical incision was chosen at the surgeon's discretion. After excluding patients receiving a relaparotomy via another site, a questionnaire about the appearance of the umbilicus was completed by the patients' guardians at postoperative month 6 to assess satisfaction and determine the visual analog scale score. A photograph of the umbilicus was taken while the questionnaire was being administered for later assessment by surgeons blinded to the scar and umbilical shape.
Forty patients were enrolled; 24 patients received a vertical incision while 16 received a periumbilical incision. The incision length was significantly shorter in the vertical incision group (median: 2.0; range: 1.5-3.0 cm vs. median: 2.75; range: 1.5-3.6 cm) (p = 0.001). The patients' guardians reported significantly higher satisfaction (p = 0.002) and higher scores on the visual analog scale (p = 0.046) in the vertical incision group (n = 22) than in the periumbilical incision group (n = 15). The surgeons' evaluation was associated with significantly more patients with a vertical incision than with a periumbilical incision achieving a cosmetically preferable outcome, including an invisible or fine scar and a normal umbilical shape.
A vertical umbilical incision can provide better postoperative cosmesis than a periumbilical incision.
经脐入路广泛应用于儿童微创手术。我们在此比较了两种经脐入路的术后美容效果:垂直切口与脐周切口。
前瞻性纳入2018年1月至2020年12月期间1岁前接受经脐剖腹手术的患者。由外科医生自行决定选择垂直切口或脐周切口。在排除通过其他部位再次剖腹手术的患者后,患者监护人在术后6个月完成一份关于脐部外观的问卷,以评估满意度并确定视觉模拟量表评分。在发放问卷时拍摄脐部照片,以供对瘢痕和脐部形状不知情的外科医生进行后续评估。
共纳入40例患者;24例接受垂直切口,16例接受脐周切口。垂直切口组的切口长度明显更短(中位数:2.0;范围:1.5 - 3.0 cm,对比中位数:2.75;范围:1.5 - 3.6 cm)(p = 0.001)。垂直切口组(n = 22)患者监护人报告中的满意度(p = 0.002)和视觉模拟量表评分(p = 0.046)均显著高于脐周切口组(n = 15)。外科医生的评估显示,垂直切口组在美容效果更佳(包括瘢痕不可见或细微以及脐部形状正常)方面的患者明显多于脐周切口组。
与脐周切口相比,垂直脐部切口可提供更好的术后美容效果。