Han Christopher S, Hancock Mark J, Sharma Sweekriti, Sharma Saurab, Harris Ian A, Cohen Steven P, Magnussen John, Maher Chris G, Traeger Adrian C
The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Apr 6;59:101960. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101960. eCollection 2023 May.
The accuracy of diagnostic tests available in primary care to identify the disc, sacroiliac joint, and facet joint as the source of low back pain is uncertain.
Systematic review of diagnostic tests available in primary care. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched between March 2006 and 25th January 2023. Pairs of reviewers independently screened all studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Pooling was performed for homogenous studies. Positive likelihood ratios (+LR) ≥2 and negative likelihood ratios (-LR) ≤0.5 were considered informative. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020169828).
We included 62 studies: 35 investigated the disc, 14 the facet joint, 11 the sacroiliac joint, and 2 investigated all three structures in patients with persistent low back pain. For risk of bias, the domain 'reference standard' scored worst, however approximately half the studies were of low risk of bias for every other domain. For the disc, pooling demonstrated MRI findings of disc degeneration and annular fissure resulted in informative +LRs: 2.53 (95% CI: 1.57-4.07) and 2.88 (95% CI: 2.02-4.10) and -LRs: 0.15 (95% CI: 0.09-0.24) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.10-0.55) respectively. Pooled results for Modic type 1, Modic type 2, and HIZ on MRI, and centralisation phenomenon yielded informative +LRs: 10.00 (95% CI: 4.20-23.82), 8.03 (95% CI: 3.23-19.97), 3.10 (95% CI: 2.27-4.25), and 3.06 (95% CI: 1.44-6.50) respectively, but uninformative -LRs: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.96), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.96), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48-0.77), and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52-0.84) respectively. For the facet joint, pooling demonstrated facet joint uptake on SPECT resulted in informative +LRs: 2.80 (95% CI: 1.82-4.31) and -LRs: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.25-0.77). For the sacroiliac joint, a combination of pain provocation tests and absence of midline low back pain resulted in informative +LRs of 2.41 (95% CI: 1.89-3.07) and 2.44 (95% CI: 1.50-3.98) and -LRs of 0.35 (95% CI: 0.12-1.01) and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.21-0.47) respectively. Radionuclide imaging yielded an informative +LR 7.33 (95% CI: 1.42-37.80) but an uninformative -LR 0.74 (95% CI: 0.41-1.34).
There are informative diagnostic tests for the disc, sacroiliac joint, and facet joint (only one test). The evidence suggests a diagnosis may be possible for some patients with low back pain, potentially guiding targeted and specific treatment approaches.
There was no funding for this study.
基层医疗中用于确定椎间盘、骶髂关节和小关节是否为腰痛根源的诊断测试的准确性尚不确定。
对基层医疗中可用的诊断测试进行系统评价。2006年3月至2023年1月25日期间检索了MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE。由两名评审员独立筛选所有研究、提取数据并使用QUADAS - 2评估偏倚风险。对同类研究进行汇总分析。阳性似然比(+LR)≥2且阴性似然比(-LR)≤0.5被认为具有参考价值。本综述已在PROSPERO(CRD42020169828)注册。
我们纳入了62项研究:35项研究椎间盘,14项研究小关节,11项研究骶髂关节,2项研究持续性腰痛患者的所有这三种结构。对于偏倚风险,“参考标准”领域得分最差,但其他领域约一半的研究偏倚风险较低。对于椎间盘,汇总分析显示,椎间盘退变和环状裂隙的MRI表现产生了有参考价值的+LR:分别为2.53(95%CI:1.57 - 4.07)和2.88(95%CI:2.02 - 4.10),以及-LR:分别为0.15(95%CI:0.09 - 0.24)和0.24(95%CI:0.10 - 0.55)。MRI上Modic 1型、Modic 2型和HIZ以及集中化现象的汇总结果分别产生了有参考价值的+LR:10.00(95%CI:4.20 - 23.82)、8.03(95%CI:3.23 - 19.97)、3.10(95%CI:2.27 - 4.25)和3.06(95%CI:1.44 - 6.50),但-LR无参考价值:分别为0.84(95%CI:0.74 - 0.96)、0.88(95%CI:0.80 - 0.96)、0.61(95%CI:0.48 - 0.77)和0.66(95%CI:0.52 - 0.84)。对于小关节,汇总分析显示SPECT上小关节摄取产生了有参考价值的+LR:2.80(95%CI:1.82 - 4.31)和-LR:0.44(95%CI:0.25 - 0.77)。对于骶髂关节,疼痛激发试验和无中线腰痛的组合产生了有参考价值的+LR:分别为2.41(95%CI:1.89 - 3.07)和2.44(95%CI:1.50 - 3.98),以及-LR:分别为0.35(95%CI:0.12 - 1.01)和0.31(95%CI:0.21 - 0.47)。放射性核素成像产生了有参考价值的+LR 7.33(95%CI:1.42 - 37.80),但-LR无参考价值0.74(95%CI:0.41 - 1.34)。
对于椎间盘、骶髂关节和小关节(仅一项测试)有具有参考价值的诊断测试。证据表明,对于一些腰痛患者可能可以做出诊断,这可能有助于指导有针对性的具体治疗方法。
本研究无资金支持。