• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简单的拟人化操作无法引起对人类的感知或提高对自动化代理的信任。

Simple manipulations of anthropomorphism fail to induce perceptions of humanness or improve trust in an automated agent.

机构信息

Discipline of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.

Discipline of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2023 Sep;111:104027. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104027. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104027
PMID:37100010
Abstract

Although automation is employed as an aid to human performance, operators often interact with automated decision aids inefficiently. The current study investigated whether anthropomorphic automation would engender higher trust and use, subsequently improving human-automation team performance. Participants performed a multi-element probabilistic signal detection task in which they diagnosed a hypothetical nuclear reactor as in a state of safety or danger. The task was completed unassisted and assisted by a 93%-reliable agent varying in anthropomorphism. Results gave no evidence that participants' perceptions of anthropomorphism differed between conditions. Further, anthropomorphic automation failed to bolster trust and automation-aided performance. Findings suggest that the benefits of anthropomorphism may be limited in some contexts.

摘要

虽然自动化被用作辅助人类表现的手段,但操作员在与自动化决策辅助工具交互时往往效率不高。本研究旨在探讨拟人化自动化是否会产生更高的信任和使用,从而提高人机团队的绩效。参与者完成了一项多元素概率信号检测任务,他们需要诊断一个假设的核反应堆是处于安全状态还是危险状态。任务是在没有帮助和由一个可靠度为 93%的、具有不同拟人化程度的代理的帮助下完成的。结果表明,参与者对拟人化的看法在不同条件下没有差异。此外,拟人化自动化未能增强信任和自动化辅助性能。研究结果表明,在某些情况下,拟人化的好处可能有限。

相似文献

1
Simple manipulations of anthropomorphism fail to induce perceptions of humanness or improve trust in an automated agent.简单的拟人化操作无法引起对人类的感知或提高对自动化代理的信任。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Sep;111:104027. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104027. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
2
A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.些许拟人化作用巨大。
Hum Factors. 2017 Feb;59(1):116-133. doi: 10.1177/0018720816687205.
3
Meaningful Communication but not Superficial Anthropomorphism Facilitates Human-Automation Trust Calibration: The Human-Automation Trust Expectation Model (HATEM).有意义的沟通而非表面的拟人化有助于人类-自动化信任校准:人类-自动化信任期望模型(HATEM)。
Hum Factors. 2024 Nov;66(11):2485-2502. doi: 10.1177/00187208231218156. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
4
Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults.具有拟人特征的决策支持辅助工具会影响年轻人和老年人的信任和表现。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):1059-72. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.691554. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
5
Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.并非所有信息都是平等的:在人机协作中披露不同类型可能性信息对信任、遵从和依赖的影响,以及对任务绩效的影响。
Hum Factors. 2020 Sep;62(6):987-1001. doi: 10.1177/0018720819862916. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.信息来源、谱系及可靠性对操作员与决策支持系统交互的影响。
Hum Factors. 2007 Oct;49(5):773-85. doi: 10.1518/001872007X230154.
7
Enhancing component-specific trust with consumer automated systems through humanness design.通过人性化设计增强消费者自动化系统中特定组件的信任度。
Ergonomics. 2023 Feb;66(2):291-302. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2079728. Epub 2022 May 27.
8
Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation.量化信任动态:人们如何在与自动化进行实时交互后调整其信任。
Hum Factors. 2023 Aug;65(5):862-878. doi: 10.1177/00187208211034716. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
9
Workload Capacity: A Response Time-Based Measure of Automation Dependence.工作量能力:一种基于响应时间的自动化依赖度量。
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):462-71. doi: 10.1177/0018720815621172. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
10
Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.对自动化的信任。第二部分。过程控制模拟中信任与人为干预的实验研究。
Ergonomics. 1996 Mar;39(3):429-60. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964474.