• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对自动化的信任。第二部分。过程控制模拟中信任与人为干预的实验研究。

Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.

作者信息

Muir B M, Moray N

出版信息

Ergonomics. 1996 Mar;39(3):429-60. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964474.

DOI:10.1080/00140139608964474
PMID:8849495
Abstract

Two experiments are reported which examined operators' trust in and use of the automation in a simulated supervisory process control task. Tests of the integrated model of human trust in machines proposed by Muir (1994) showed that models of interpersonal trust capture some important aspects of the nature and dynamics of human-machine trust. Results showed that operators' subjective ratings of trust in the automation were based mainly upon their perception of its competence. Trust was significantly reduced by any sign of incompetence in the automation, even one which had no effect on overall system performance. Operators' trust changed very little with experience, with a few notable exceptions. Distrust in one function of an automatic component spread to reduce trust in another function of the same component, but did not generalize to another independent automatic component in the same system, or to other systems. There was high positive correlation between operators' trust in and use of the automation; operators used automation they trusted and rejected automation they distrusted, preferring to do the control task manually. There was an inverse relationship between trust and monitoring of the automation. These results suggest that operators' subjective ratings of trust and the properties of the automation which determine their trust, can be used to predict and optimize the dynamic allocation of functions in automated systems.

摘要

本文报告了两项实验,它们研究了在模拟的监督过程控制任务中,操作员对自动化的信任及使用情况。对缪尔(1994年)提出的人机信任综合模型的测试表明,人际信任模型捕捉到了人机信任的本质和动态变化的一些重要方面。结果显示,操作员对自动化的主观信任评级主要基于他们对其能力的感知。自动化中任何能力不足的迹象都会显著降低信任,即使这对整体系统性能没有影响。除了一些显著的例外情况,操作员的信任随经验变化很小。对自动组件某一功能的不信任会蔓延,导致对同一组件另一功能的信任降低,但不会扩展到同一系统中的另一个独立自动组件,也不会扩展到其他系统。操作员对自动化的信任和使用之间存在高度正相关;操作员使用他们信任的自动化,拒绝他们不信任的自动化,更愿意手动执行控制任务。信任与对自动化的监控之间存在反比关系。这些结果表明,操作员的主观信任评级以及决定他们信任的自动化特性,可用于预测和优化自动化系统中功能的动态分配。

相似文献

1
Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.对自动化的信任。第二部分。过程控制模拟中信任与人为干预的实验研究。
Ergonomics. 1996 Mar;39(3):429-60. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964474.
2
Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems.人机系统中的信任、控制策略与功能分配
Ergonomics. 1992 Oct;35(10):1243-70. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967392.
3
Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.多任务工作空间中的自动化信任和注意力分配。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.信息来源、谱系及可靠性对操作员与决策支持系统交互的影响。
Hum Factors. 2007 Oct;49(5):773-85. doi: 10.1518/001872007X230154.
5
Revisiting human-machine trust: a replication study of Muir and Moray (1996) using a simulated pasteurizer plant task.重新审视人机信任:使用模拟巴氏杀菌器工厂任务对 Muir 和 Moray(1996)的复制研究。
Ergonomics. 2021 Sep;64(9):1132-1145. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1909752. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
6
Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.自动化决策辅助工具对模拟监管控制任务中的性能、操作人员行为和工作负荷的影响。
Ergonomics. 2009 May;52(5):512-23. doi: 10.1080/00140130802379129.
7
Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.动态控制任务中自动化水平对绩效、态势感知和工作负荷的影响。
Ergonomics. 1999 Mar;42(3):462-92. doi: 10.1080/001401399185595.
8
System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation.系统可靠性、性能以及对自适应自动化的信任。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Jan;52:333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
9
Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation.量化信任动态:人们如何在与自动化进行实时交互后调整其信任。
Hum Factors. 2023 Aug;65(5):862-878. doi: 10.1177/00187208211034716. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
10
Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models.设计供人类使用的自动化:实证研究与量化模型。
Ergonomics. 2000 Jul;43(7):931-51. doi: 10.1080/001401300409125.

引用本文的文献

1
Building trust in the age of human-machine interaction: insights, challenges, and future directions.在人机交互时代建立信任:见解、挑战与未来方向。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Jul 14;12:1535082. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1535082. eCollection 2025.
2
Dissociable effects of fatigue on performance and metacognition from automatic target cuing in undersea threat detection.疲劳对水下威胁探测中自动目标提示的性能和元认知的可分离影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 15;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00638-1.
3
Trust, risk perception, and intention to use autonomous vehicles: an interdisciplinary bibliometric review.
信任、风险认知与使用自动驾驶汽车的意愿:一项跨学科文献计量学综述
AI Soc. 2025;40(2):1091-1111. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-01895-2. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
4
The Social Triad Model: Considering the Deployer in a Novel Approach to Trust in Human-Robot Interaction.社会三元模型:在一种关于人机交互信任的新方法中考虑部署者
Int J Soc Robot. 2024;16(6):1405-1418. doi: 10.1007/s12369-023-01048-3. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Developing trustworthy artificial intelligence: insights from research on interpersonal, human-automation, and human-AI trust.开发值得信赖的人工智能:来自人际信任、人机自动化信任和人类与人工智能信任研究的见解。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 17;15:1382693. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382693. eCollection 2024.
6
A review of mathematical models of human trust in automation.人类对自动化信任的数学模型综述。
Front Neuroergon. 2023 Jun 13;4:1171403. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1171403. eCollection 2023.
7
Measuring trust: a text analysis approach to compare, contrast, and select trust questionnaires.测量信任:一种用于比较、对比和选择信任调查问卷的文本分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 15;14:1192020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192020. eCollection 2023.
8
Research on the influence and mechanism of human-vehicle moral matching on trust in autonomous vehicles.人车道德匹配对自动驾驶汽车信任的影响及机制研究
Front Psychol. 2023 May 30;14:1071872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071872. eCollection 2023.
9
Reliable and transparent in-vehicle agents lead to higher behavioral trust in conditionally automated driving systems.可靠且透明的车内代理会提高对有条件自动驾驶系统的行为信任度。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1121622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1121622. eCollection 2023.
10
How to improve pedestrians' trust in automated vehicles: new road infrastructure, external human-machine interface with anthropomorphism, or conventional road signaling?如何提高行人对自动驾驶车辆的信任:新型道路基础设施、具有拟人化的外部人机交互界面,还是传统道路信号?
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1129341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129341. eCollection 2023.