Suppr超能文献

卫生专业人员关于使用氟化物 varnish 预防学龄前儿童龋齿的建议。 (注:这里“varnish”可能是专业术语,具体含义需结合医学领域进一步确定,暂直译为“varnish”)

Health professionals' recommendations on the use of fluoride varnish for caries prevention in preschool children.

作者信息

Couto Flávia Macedo, de Sousa Fernanda Santos de Oliveira, Vicente Gabriela Cristina, Castro Daniel Pereira de Faria, Nadanovsky Paulo, Dos Santos Ana Paula Pires, Barja-Fidalgo Fernanda

机构信息

Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2024 Jan;34(1):11-25. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13074. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fluoride varnish (FV) is widely recommended for caries prevention in preschool children, despite its anticaries benefits being uncertain and modest. Dentists often report using clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as a source of scientific information.

AIM

To identify and analyze recommendations for clinical practice on the use of FV for caries prevention in preschool children and to assess the methodological quality of the CPG on this topic.

DESIGN

Two researchers independently used 12 search strategies and searched the first five pages of Google Search™ and three guideline databases for recommendations freely available to health professionals on the use of FV for caries prevention in preschoolers. Then, they retrieved and recorded recommendations that met the eligibility criteria and extracted the data. A third researcher resolved disagreements. Each included CPG was appraised using the AGREE II instrument.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine documents were included. Recommendations varied according to age, patients' caries risk, and application frequency. Of the six CPGs, only one scored above 70% in the AGREE II overall assessment.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations on the use of FV lacked scientific evidence, and CPGs were of poor quality. Application of FV is widely recommended despite recent evidence showing an uncertain, modest, and possibly not clinically relevant anticaries benefit. Dentists should be aware that it is necessary to critically appraise CPGs since they may be of poor quality.

摘要

背景

尽管氟化物漆(FV)预防龋齿的益处尚不确定且有限,但仍被广泛推荐用于学龄前儿童的龋齿预防。牙医经常报告将临床实践指南(CPG)作为科学信息来源。

目的

识别并分析关于使用FV预防学龄前儿童龋齿的临床实践建议,并评估该主题CPG的方法学质量。

设计

两名研究人员独立使用12种检索策略,在谷歌搜索™的前五页以及三个指南数据库中搜索可供卫生专业人员免费获取的关于使用FV预防学龄前儿童龋齿的建议。然后,他们检索并记录符合纳入标准的建议,并提取数据。第三名研究人员解决分歧。使用AGREE II工具对每个纳入的CPG进行评估。

结果

纳入29份文件。建议因年龄、患者龋齿风险和应用频率而异。在六个CPG中,只有一个在AGREE II总体评估中得分高于70%。

结论

关于使用FV的建议缺乏科学证据,CPG质量较差。尽管最近有证据表明FV预防龋齿的益处不确定、有限且可能与临床无关,但仍广泛推荐使用FV。牙医应意识到有必要严格评估CPG,因为它们的质量可能较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验