Suppr超能文献

低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查基线的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008, China.

Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 May 5;136(9):1047-1056. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002353.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a more effective approach and has the potential to detect lung cancer more accurately. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of population-based screening studies primarily assessing baseline LDCT screening for lung cancer.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database, and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to April 10, 2022. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data of true positives, false-positives, false negatives, and true negatives in the screening test were extracted. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. A bivariate random effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was measured using the Higgins I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using a Deeks' funnel plot and linear regression test.

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies with 157,762 individuals were identified for the final qualitative synthesis; most of them were from Europe and America (38 studies), ten were from Asia, and one was from Oceania. The recruitment period was 1992 to 2018, and most of the subjects were 40 to 75 years old. The analysis showed that the AUC of lung cancer screening by LDCT was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), and the overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. The funnel plot and test results showed that there was no significant publication bias among the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline LDCT has high sensitivity and specificity as a screening technique for lung cancer. However, long-term follow-up of the whole study population (including those with a negative baseline screening result) should be performed to enhance the accuracy of LDCT screening.

摘要

背景

使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)进行筛查是一种更有效的方法,有可能更准确地发现肺癌。我们旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以评估主要评估基线 LDCT 筛查肺癌的基于人群的筛查研究的准确性。

方法

截至 2022 年 4 月 10 日,我们在 MEDLINE、Excerpta Medica Database 和 Web of Science 上搜索了已发表的文章。根据纳入和排除标准,提取筛查试验中的真阳性、假阳性、假阴性和真阴性的数据。使用诊断准确性研究的质量评估-2 来评估文献的质量。使用双变量随机效应模型估计合并的敏感性和特异性。使用分层汇总受试者工作特征分析计算曲线下面积(AUC)。使用 Higgins I2 统计量测量研究之间的异质性,并使用 Deeks 漏斗图和线性回归检验评估发表偏倚。

结果

最终定性综合分析共纳入了 49 项研究,涉及 157762 人;其中大多数来自欧洲和美洲(38 项研究),10 项来自亚洲,1 项来自大洋洲。招募期为 1992 年至 2018 年,大多数受试者年龄在 40 至 75 岁之间。分析表明,LDCT 筛查肺癌的 AUC 为 0.98(95%CI:0.96-0.99),总体敏感性和特异性分别为 0.97(95%CI:0.94-0.98)和 0.87(95%CI:0.82-0.91)。漏斗图和检验结果表明,纳入的研究没有明显的发表偏倚。

结论

基线 LDCT 作为肺癌筛查技术具有较高的敏感性和特异性。然而,应该对整个研究人群(包括基线筛查结果为阴性的人群)进行长期随访,以提高 LDCT 筛查的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3a7/10228483/476e2111d5bc/cm9-136-1047-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验