• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内科医生、家庭医生和精神科医生针对患者病例的初步临床判断:I. 问题评估与诊断可能性

Initial clinical judgments by internists, family physicians, and psychiatrists in response to patient vignettes: I. Assessment of problems and diagnostic possibilities.

作者信息

Yager J, Linn L S, Leake B, Gastaldo G, Palkowski C

出版信息

Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1986 May;8(3):145-51. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(86)90072-1.

DOI:10.1016/0163-8343(86)90072-1
PMID:3710146
Abstract

A sample of 146 physicians from internal medicine, family medicine, and psychiatry responded to two written clinical vignettes describing patients with combinations of commonly seen somatic and psychologic complaints. The physicians included housestaff of all levels of training, full-time academic faculty, and community-based clinical faculty. Enormous variation was seen in all specialties in the numbers and types of problems and diagnoses suggested by the physicians. Aside from one or two areas, there were few differences among the specialties or by level of training with regard to the numbers or types of problems identified and tentative diagnoses recorded. The variability within specialty groups was greater than among the groups. Physician behavior in response to one vignette was highly correlated with responses to the second vignette.

摘要

来自内科、家庭医学和精神病学的146名医生对两份书面临床案例进行了回应,这些案例描述了患有常见躯体和心理症状组合的患者。参与的医生包括各级培训的住院医师、全职学术教员和社区临床教员。所有专业的医生所提出的问题数量、类型以及诊断建议都存在巨大差异。除了一两个领域外,各专业之间或不同培训水平在识别出的问题数量或类型以及记录的初步诊断方面几乎没有差异。专业组内的变异性大于组间变异性。医生对一个案例的反应与对第二个案例的反应高度相关。

相似文献

1
Initial clinical judgments by internists, family physicians, and psychiatrists in response to patient vignettes: I. Assessment of problems and diagnostic possibilities.内科医生、家庭医生和精神科医生针对患者病例的初步临床判断:I. 问题评估与诊断可能性
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1986 May;8(3):145-51. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(86)90072-1.
2
Initial clinical judgments by internists, family physicians, and psychiatrists in response to patient vignettes: II. Ordering of laboratory tests, consultations, and treatments.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1986 May;8(3):152-8. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(86)90073-3.
3
Differences in the numbers and costs of tests ordered by internists, family physicians, and psychiatrists.
Inquiry. 1984 Fall;21(3):266-75.
4
Confidence of academic general internists and family physicians to teach ambulatory procedures.学术型普通内科医生和家庭医生教授门诊操作的信心。
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jun;15(6):353-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.04109.x.
5
Recognition and treatment of depressive disorders by internal medicine attendings and housestaff.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 May;19(3):179-84. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(97)00005-4.
6
Comparison of activity level and service intensity of male and female physicians in five fields of medicine in Ontario.安大略省五个医学领域中男性和女性医生的活动水平与服务强度比较。
CMAJ. 1995 Oct 15;153(8):1097-106.
7
Combined internal medicine-psychiatry and family medicine-psychiatry training programs, 1999-2000: program directors' perspectives.1999 - 2000年内科 - 精神病学与家庭医学 - 精神病学联合培训项目:项目主任的观点
Acad Med. 2001 Dec;76(12):1247-52. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200112000-00020.
8
Practice and career outcomes of double-boarded psychiatrists.双证精神科医生的实践和职业成果。
Psychosomatics. 2011 Nov-Dec;52(6):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.08.006.
9
Mental health and psychiatry training in primary care residency programs. Part II. What skills and diagnoses are taught, how adequate, and what affects training directors' satisfaction?基层医疗住院医师培训项目中的心理健康与精神病学培训。第二部分。教授了哪些技能和诊断内容,是否足够,以及哪些因素影响培训主任的满意度?
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 May-Jun;28(3):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.10.004.
10
A comparison of self-perceived clinical competencies in primary care residency graduates.
Pediatr Res. 1993 Nov;34(5):555-9. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199311000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Online Symptom Checkers: Recommendations for a Vignette-Based Clinical Evaluation Standard.在线症状检查器:基于病例的临床评估标准的推荐。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 26;24(10):e37408. doi: 10.2196/37408.
2
The Triage Capability of Laypersons: Retrospective Exploratory Analysis.非专业人员的分诊能力:回顾性探索性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 12;6(10):e38977. doi: 10.2196/38977.
3
Triage Accuracy of Symptom Checker Apps: 5-Year Follow-up Evaluation.症状检查器应用程序的分诊准确性:5 年随访评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 10;24(5):e31810. doi: 10.2196/31810.
4
Treatment and follow-up of anxiety and depression in clinical-scenario patients: survey of Saskatchewan family physicians.临床情境下患者的焦虑和抑郁治疗及随访:萨斯喀彻温省家庭医生调查。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Mar;58(3):e152-8.
5
Diagnoses of anxiety and depression in clinical-scenario patients: survey of Saskatchewan family physicians.临床情境下患者的焦虑和抑郁诊断:萨斯喀彻温省家庭医生调查。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Mar;58(3):e144-51.