• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定复苏状态:一项对医学专业人员的调查。

Determining resuscitation status: a survey of medical professionals.

作者信息

Perry S W, Schwartz H I, Amchin J

出版信息

Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1986 May;8(3):198-202. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(86)90080-0.

DOI:10.1016/0163-8343(86)90080-0
PMID:3710154
Abstract

Regarding the determination of resuscitation status (RS) and the writing of do-not-resuscitate orders, we compared the recent Presidential Guidelines with the attitudes and perceptions of 143 medical professionals in a major medical center. Seventy-four percent of respondents believed that RS was primarily determined by the physician. Only 1% believed the patient decides and a minority (40%) believed the patient should decide; 61% would want to decide for themselves if they were ill. Most respondents agreed that neither patients nor staff were well-informed about the individual patient's RS. When presented case vignettes requiring a decision about RS, the respondents frequently chose a RS contrary to the wishes of a competent patient. The findings of this survey point to the significant differences between the Presidential Commission's guidelines and the actual attitudes and perceived practices of clinicians.

摘要

关于复苏状态(RS)的判定及“不要复苏”医嘱的开具,我们将近期的总统指南与一家大型医疗中心143名医学专业人员的态度和看法进行了比较。74%的受访者认为RS主要由医生决定。只有1%的人认为由患者决定,少数人(40%)认为患者应该参与决定;61%的人表示如果自己生病,希望自己做决定。大多数受访者同意,患者和工作人员对个体患者的RS了解都不足。当给出需要对RS做出决定的病例 vignettes时,受访者经常选择与有行为能力患者的意愿相悖的RS。这项调查结果表明总统委员会的指南与临床医生的实际态度和认知做法之间存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
Determining resuscitation status: a survey of medical professionals.确定复苏状态:一项对医学专业人员的调查。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1986 May;8(3):198-202. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(86)90080-0.
2
Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States.伦理决策与患者自主权:日本和美国医生与患者的比较
Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1172-82. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1172.
3
Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. How are they used and what is their impact?医院中针对重症患者的“不要复苏”医嘱。这些医嘱是如何使用的,以及它们有什么影响?
JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):233-7.
4
Do-not-resuscitate orders--should the patient be informed?“不要复苏”医嘱——是否应告知患者?
J Intern Med. 1997 May;241(5):421-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.138144000.x.
5
Resuscitation: how do we decide? A prospective study of physicians' preferences and the clinical course of hospitalized patients.
JAMA. 1986 Mar 14;255(10):1316-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.255.10.1316.
6
Limits of patient autonomy. Physician attitudes and practices regarding life-sustaining treatments and euthanasia.患者自主权的限制。医生对维持生命治疗和安乐死的态度及做法。
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Mar 22;153(6):722-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.153.6.722.
7
The do-not-resuscitate order in teaching hospitals.教学医院中的“不要复苏”医嘱。
JAMA. 1985 Apr 19;253(15):2236-9.
8
The use and implications of do not resuscitate orders in intensive care units.重症监护病房中“不要复苏”医嘱的应用及影响
JAMA. 1986 Jan 17;255(3):351-6.
9
Withdrawal of life support--who should decide? Differences in attitudes among the general public, nurses and physicians.
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Sep;25(9):949-54. doi: 10.1007/s001340050987.
10
Evaluation of patient, physician, nurse, and family attitudes toward do not resuscitate orders.评估患者、医生、护士及家属对放弃心肺复苏医嘱的态度。
Arch Intern Med. 1990 Mar;150(3):653-8.