• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过在线混合方法库调查识别多样性、公平性和包容性增强机会。

Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Oct 1;110(4):438-448. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1436.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2022.1436
PMID:37101916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10124613/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A mixed methods survey was conducted at a health sciences library to assess patrons' perceptions of the library's digital and physical environments in relation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

METHODS

Developed by the library's DEI Team and preceded by a pilot assessment, the survey posed 17 Likert Scale questions and 2 free-text response questions on the topics of belonging, inclusivity, equitability, emotional and physical safety, and commitment to DEI. The survey was created in Qualtrics, pilot tested, and launched in February 2020 for approximately 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Objective question responses were received from 101 individuals, with 24 open-ended responses. The quantitative findings showed largely positive perceptions of the DEI climate. Questions about feeling welcome and feeling physically safe were among those with the highest responses. The three lower-scoring questions indicate areas for improvement, including services for people whose native language is not English, for individuals with disabilities, and for families. The qualitative findings indicate the library's strengths include its exhibitions, welcoming atmosphere, and LGBTQ+ inclusivity initiatives. In contrast, opportunities for enhancement encompass non-English language resources, website updates, and accessibility to some physical spaces.

CONCLUSION

The DEI Team is using the online survey data to enhance library services, staffing, programming, policies, and spaces. These improvements include looking into providing a space for patrons with families, expanding services for individuals whose first language is not English, assessing library accessibility for people with physical disabilities, and enhancing the physical space with quiet areas, improved lighting, and meditation spaces. Employee DEI training is ongoing, using results from a training needs survey to identify knowledge gaps. The library has a history of successful partnerships with campus entities, which will help the DEI Team to move forward with their work.

摘要

目的

在一所健康科学图书馆进行了一项混合方法调查,以评估读者对图书馆数字和物理环境在多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)方面的看法。

方法

该调查由图书馆的 DEI 团队开发,在试点评估之前,提出了 17 个李克特量表问题和 2 个关于归属感、包容性、公平性、情感和物理安全以及对 DEI 的承诺的自由文本问题。该调查是在 Qualtrics 中创建的,经过试点测试,并于 2020 年 2 月推出,为期约 12 周。

结果

共有 101 人对客观问题做出了回应,其中有 24 人对开放式问题做出了回应。定量调查结果显示,对 DEI 氛围的看法总体上较为积极。关于受欢迎和感到身体安全的问题是得分最高的问题之一。得分较低的三个问题表明需要改进的地方,包括为母语不是英语的人、残疾人和家庭提供服务。定性调查结果表明,图书馆的优势包括其展览、欢迎氛围和 LGBTQ+包容性举措。相比之下,增强的机会包括非英语语言资源、网站更新以及一些物理空间的可访问性。

结论

DEI 团队正在利用在线调查数据来增强图书馆服务、人员配备、计划、政策和空间。这些改进包括为有家庭的读者提供空间、扩大为非英语母语人士提供的服务、评估身体残疾人士对图书馆的可访问性,以及通过安静区域、改进照明和冥想空间来改善物理空间。员工 DEI 培训正在进行中,使用培训需求调查的结果来确定知识差距。图书馆与校园实体有着成功的合作历史,这将有助于 DEI 团队推进他们的工作。

相似文献

1
Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey.通过在线混合方法库调查识别多样性、公平性和包容性增强机会。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Oct 1;110(4):438-448. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1436.
2
Developing and conducting a language inclusivity assessment on a health science library's website, LibGuides, and signage.开发并进行一项语言包容性评估,评估对象为健康科学图书馆网站、LibGuides 和标识牌。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;112(1):48-54. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1691.
3
Developing a Culture of Inclusivity through a Library Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Team. Part 1: Team Formation.通过图书馆多样性、公平性和包容性团队培养包容文化。第 1 部分:团队组建。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2022 Jan-Mar;41(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2021.2020565.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Evaluation and students' perception of a health equity education program in physical therapy: a mixed methods pilot study.物理治疗中健康公平教育计划的评估和学生感知:一项混合方法试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 1;24(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05471-6.
6
Diversity, equity, and inclusion within the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia: A mixed methods assessment.儿科麻醉学会中的多样性、公平性和包容性:混合方法评估。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Jun;33(6):435-445. doi: 10.1111/pan.14642. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
Interprofessional Perceptions of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Cultural Competence, and Humility Among Students and Faculty: A Mixed-Methods Study.跨专业学生和教师对多样性、公平、包容、文化能力和谦逊的认知:一项混合方法研究。
J Allied Health. 2023 Summer;52(2):89-96.
8
Understanding faculty perceptions and experiences related to climate, diversity, equity, and inclusion at a college of pharmacy: A pilot study.了解药学院教师对气候、多样性、公平和包容的看法和经验:一项试点研究。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2024 Jan;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
9
Perceptions of workplace climate and diversity, equity, and inclusion within health services and policy research.卫生服务和政策研究领域中对工作场所氛围以及多样性、公平性和包容性的认知。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):314-324. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14032. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities in health services; diversity, equity, and inclusion; and implementation science.为社区主导的遗传性出血性疾病国家研究蓝图奠定基础:卫生服务中的研究重点;多样性、公平性和包容性;以及实施科学。
Expert Rev Hematol. 2023 Mar;16(sup1):87-106. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2183836.

本文引用的文献

1
Starting with I: Combating Anti-Blackness in Libraries.从 I 开始:在图书馆中对抗反黑人主义。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2021 Apr-Jun;40(2):139-150. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2021.1903276. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 Survey Report.医学图书馆协会多样性和包容性工作组 2019 年调查报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;108(3):503-512. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.948.
3
Measuring impostor phenomenon among health sciences librarians.测量健康科学图书馆员中的冒名顶替者现象。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):323-332. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.644. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
4
An exploratory study on microaggressions in medical school: What are they and why should we care?医学教育中的微侵犯现象探索研究:它们是什么,我们为什么要关注?
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Jun;8(3):143-151. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0516-3.
5
Critical librarianship in health sciences libraries: an introduction.健康科学图书馆的关键图书馆学:导言。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):258-264. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.620. Epub 2019 Apr 1.