• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在干旱和湿润条件下,全球干旱地区的生态系统植被对气候变化的响应截然不同。

Contrasting ecosystem vegetation response in global drylands under drying and wetting conditions.

机构信息

Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Centre for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Jul;29(14):3954-3969. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16745. Epub 2023 May 8.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.16745
PMID:37103433
Abstract

Increasing aridity is one major consequence of ongoing global climate change and is expected to cause widespread changes in key ecosystem attributes, functions, and dynamics. This is especially the case in naturally vulnerable ecosystems, such as drylands. While we have an overall understanding of past aridity trends, the linkage between temporal dynamics in aridity and dryland ecosystem responses remain largely unknown. Here, we examined recent trends in aridity over the past two decades within global drylands as a basis for exploring the response of ecosystem state variables associated with land and atmosphere processes (e.g., vegetation cover, vegetation functioning, soil water availability, land cover, burned area, and vapor-pressure deficit) to these trends. We identified five clusters, characterizing spatiotemporal patterns in aridity between 2000 and 2020. Overall, we observe that 44.5% of all areas are getting dryer, 31.6% getting wetter, and 23.8% have no trends in aridity. Our results show strongest correlations between trends in ecosystem state variables and aridity in clusters with increasing aridity, which matches expectations of systemic acclimatization of the ecosystem to a reduction in water availability/water stress. Trends in vegetation (expressed by leaf area index [LAI]) are affected differently by potential driving factors (e.g., environmental, and climatic factors, soil properties, and population density) in areas experiencing water-related stress as compared to areas not exposed to water-related stress. Canopy height for example, has a positive impact on trends in LAI when the system is stressed but does not impact the trends in non-stressed systems. Conversely, opposite relationships were found for soil parameters such as root-zone water storage capacity and organic carbon density. How potential driving factors impact dryland vegetation differently depending on water-related stress (or no stress) is important, for example within management strategies to maintain and restore dryland vegetation.

摘要

变干是正在进行的全球气候变化的一个主要后果,预计将导致关键生态系统属性、功能和动态发生广泛变化。在自然脆弱的生态系统中,情况尤其如此,例如干旱地区。虽然我们对过去的干旱趋势有总体了解,但干旱的时间动态与旱地生态系统响应之间的联系在很大程度上仍然未知。在这里,我们研究了过去二十年全球干旱地区的干旱趋势近期趋势,作为探索与陆地和大气过程相关的生态系统状态变量(例如植被覆盖、植被功能、土壤水分可用性、土地覆盖、燃烧面积和水汽压亏缺)对这些趋势的响应的基础。我们确定了五个集群,描述了 2000 年至 2020 年期间干旱的时空模式。总体而言,我们观察到 44.5%的地区变得更加干燥,31.6%的地区变得更加湿润,23.8%的地区干旱趋势没有变化。我们的结果表明,在干旱程度增加的集群中,生态系统状态变量的趋势与干旱之间存在最强的相关性,这与生态系统对水分减少/水分胁迫的系统适应的预期一致。植被趋势(以叶面积指数 [LAI] 表示)受潜在驱动因素(例如环境和气候因素、土壤特性和人口密度)的影响不同在经历与水相关的压力的地区与未暴露于与水相关的压力的地区。例如,当系统受到压力时,林冠高度对 LAI 趋势有积极影响,但不会影响非压力系统的趋势。相反,对于根区储水能力和有机碳密度等土壤参数,则发现了相反的关系。潜在驱动因素如何根据与水相关的压力(或无压力)对旱地植被产生不同的影响很重要,例如在维持和恢复旱地植被的管理策略中。

相似文献

1
Contrasting ecosystem vegetation response in global drylands under drying and wetting conditions.在干旱和湿润条件下,全球干旱地区的生态系统植被对气候变化的响应截然不同。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Jul;29(14):3954-3969. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16745. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Dominance of soil moisture over aridity in explaining vegetation greenness across global drylands.土壤湿度对全球干旱地区植被绿色度的解释力超过干旱程度。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 20;917:170482. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170482. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
3
Divergent sensitivity of vegetation to aridity between drylands and humid regions.干旱区和湿润区植被对干旱的敏感性存在差异。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Aug 1;884:163910. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163910. Epub 2023 May 3.
4
Prevalence and drivers of abrupt vegetation shifts in global drylands.全球干旱地区植被突然变化的流行率和驱动因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 25;119(43):e2123393119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2123393119. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
Temperature and aridity regulate spatial variability of soil multifunctionality in drylands across the globe.温度和干旱调节全球干旱地区土壤多功能性的空间变异性。
Ecology. 2018 May;99(5):1184-1193. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2199.
6
Diagnosis of GLDAS LSM based aridity index and dryland identification.基于 GLDAS LSM 的干旱指数诊断和旱地识别。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Apr 15;119:162-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.040. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
7
Greater increases in China's dryland ecosystem vulnerability in drier conditions than in wetter conditions.中国旱地生态系统脆弱性在干旱条件下的增长大于在湿润条件下的增长。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 1;291:112689. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112689. Epub 2021 May 5.
8
Carrying capacity for vegetation across northern China drylands.中国北方干旱地区植被的承载能力。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 25;710:136391. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136391. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Soil erodibility for water and wind erosion and its relationship to vegetation and soil properties in China's drylands.中国旱地水蚀和风蚀的土壤可蚀性及其与植被和土壤性质的关系。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 10;903:166639. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166639. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
10
Influence of vegetation pattern and aridity on soil properties related soil available water in the Mediterranean regions.植被格局和干旱对地中海地区土壤特性与土壤有效水的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;366:121841. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121841. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonlinear responses of coupled socioecological systems to land use and climate changes in the Yangtze river basin.耦合社会生态系统对长江流域土地利用和气候变化的非线性响应
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92084-8.
2
Spatial and temporal variation of net primary productivity of herbaceous marshes and its climatic drivers in China.中国草本沼泽净初级生产力的时空变化及其气候驱动因素
Front Plant Sci. 2024 May 14;15:1380081. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1380081. eCollection 2024.