Jaggar Jessica, Cleveland Kerry O, Twilla Jennifer D, Patterson Shanise, Hobbs Athena L V
College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave., Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Methodist University Hospital, 1265 Union Ave., Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Apr 5;11(2):70. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11020070.
The CDC's Core Elements of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) lists intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) conversion as an important pharmacy-based intervention. However, despite the existence of a pharmacist-driven IV to PO conversion protocol, conversion rates within our healthcare system remained low. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a revision to the current conversion protocol on conversion rates, using linezolid as a marker due to its high PO bioavailability and high IV cost. This retrospective, observational study was conducted within a healthcare system composed of five adult acute care facilities. The conversion eligibility criteria were evaluated and revised on 30 November 2021. The pre-intervention period started February 2021 and ended November 2021. The post-intervention period was December 2021 to March 2022. The primary objective of this study was to establish if there was a difference in PO linezolid utilization reported as days of therapy per 1000 days present (DOT/1000 DP) between the pre- and post-intervention periods. IV linezolid utilization and cost savings were investigated as secondary objectives. The average DOT/1000 DP for IV linezolid decreased from 52.1 to 35.4 in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively ( < 0.01). Inversely, the average DOT/1000 DP for PO linezolid increased from 38.9 in the pre-intervention to 58.8 for the post-intervention period, < 0.01. This mirrored an increase in the average percentage of PO use from 42.9 to 62.4% for the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively ( < 0.01). A system-wide cost savings analysis showed projected total annual cost savings of USD 85,096.09 for the system, with monthly post-intervention savings of USD 7091.34. The pre-intervention average monthly spend on IV linezolid at the academic flagship hospital was USD 17,008.10, which decreased to USD 11,623.57 post-intervention; a 32% reduction. PO linezolid spend pre-intervention was USD 664.97 and increased to USD 965.20 post-intervention. The average monthly spend on IV linezolid for the four non-academic hospitals was USD 946.36 pre-intervention, which decreased to USD 348.99 post-intervention; a 63.1% reduction ( < 0.01). Simultaneously, the average monthly spend for PO linezolid was USD 45.66 pre-intervention and increased to USD 71.19 post-intervention ( = 0.03) This study shows the significant impact that an ASP intervention had on IV to PO conversion rates and subsequent spend. By revising criteria for IV to PO conversion, tracking and reporting results, and educating pharmacists, this led to significantly more PO linezolid use and reduced the overall cost in a large healthcare system.
美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)核心要素将静脉注射(IV)转为口服(PO)列为一项重要的基于药房的干预措施。然而,尽管存在由药剂师推动的IV转PO转换方案,但我们医疗系统内的转换率仍然很低。由于利奈唑胺口服生物利用度高且静脉注射成本高,我们旨在以其为指标评估对当前转换方案进行修订对转换率的影响。这项回顾性观察研究在一个由五家成人急性护理机构组成的医疗系统内进行。转换资格标准于2021年11月30日进行了评估和修订。干预前期从2021年2月开始,至2021年11月结束。干预期为2021年12月至2022年3月。本研究的主要目的是确定干预前后以每1000天治疗天数(DOT/1000 DP)报告的口服利奈唑胺使用情况是否存在差异。静脉注射利奈唑胺的使用情况和成本节约作为次要目标进行调查。干预前后静脉注射利奈唑胺的平均DOT/1000 DP分别从52.1降至35.4(<0.01)。相反,口服利奈唑胺的平均DOT/1000 DP从干预前的38.9增加到干预期的58.8(<0.01)。这反映出干预前后口服使用的平均百分比分别从42.9%增加到62.4%(<0.01)。全系统成本节约分析显示,该系统预计每年总节约成本85,096.09美元,干预后每月节约7091.34美元。学术旗舰医院干预前静脉注射利奈唑胺的平均月支出为17,008.10美元,干预后降至11,623.57美元;降低了32%。干预前口服利奈唑胺支出为664.97美元,干预后增至965.20美元。四家非学术医院干预前静脉注射利奈唑胺的平均月支出为946.36美元,干预后降至348.99美元;降低了63.1%(<0.01)。同时,口服利奈唑胺的平均月支出干预前为45.66美元,干预后增至71.19美元(P = 0.03)。本研究表明,ASP干预对IV转PO转换率及后续支出有显著影响。通过修订IV转PO转换标准、跟踪和报告结果以及对药剂师进行培训,在一个大型医疗系统中显著增加了口服利奈唑胺的使用并降低了总体成本。