Suppr超能文献

手动牙刷与电动牙刷在乳牙列中的功效:一项使用数码照片图像分析的随机交叉临床试验。

Manual Versus Electric Toothbrush Efficacy in the Primary Dentition: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Using Image Analysis of Digital Photographs.

作者信息

Elizondo Marí Lidia, Rosa Guillermo Martín, Antola Lorena Dos Santos, Galiana Andrea Verónica

机构信息

Dr. Elizondo is a associate professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Medicine, National University of the Northeast, Corrientes, Corrientes, Argentina;, Email:

Dr. Rosa is an associate professor, Postgraduate Department, School of Dentistry, School of Medicine, National University of the Northeast, Corrientes, Corrientes, Argentina.

出版信息

J Dent Child (Chic). 2023 Jan 15;90(1):31-38.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy in dental biofilm (DB) removal between electric toothbrushes versus manual toothbrushes in primary dentition using an Image Analysis System (IAS) of digital photographs.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, blind, crossover clinical trial was conducted for 12 weeks with children between four to six years of age. The amount of DB was evaluated at zero, four, eight and 12 weeks. The degree of acceptance of the type of toothbrush used by the child was assessed at week 12.
Twenty-two children participated and 176 photographs were taken, with 1,408 images of primary incisors being digitally analyzed by IAS. DB was significantly reduced by both types of toothbrushes on day zero (manual=7.44±1.83 percent; electric= 9.80±2.03 percent) and at week four (manual=8.57±2.23 percent; electric= 5.85±2.10 percent). However, there was no statistically significant difference in DB reduction when both types were compared. After week four, when compared prospectively, there was a statistically significant reduction ( <0.05) of DB for the electric toothbrush only. Electric toothbrushes had a significantly greater acceptance by the participants ( <0.01).
Electric toothbrushes eliminated DB better and were more accepted by the children than manual toothbrushes.

摘要

使用数码照片图像分析系统(IAS)评估电动牙刷与手动牙刷在乳牙列中去除牙菌斑(DB)的效果。

对4至6岁儿童进行了一项为期12周的前瞻性、随机、对照、盲法、交叉临床试验。在第0、4、8和12周评估牙菌斑量。在第12周评估儿童对所使用牙刷类型的接受程度。

22名儿童参与,共拍摄了176张照片,IAS对其中1408张乳切牙图像进行了数字分析。在第0天(手动牙刷=7.44±1.83%;电动牙刷=9.80±2.03%)和第4周(手动牙刷=8.57±2.23%;电动牙刷=5.85±2.10%)时,两种类型的牙刷均显著减少了牙菌斑。然而,比较两种类型时,牙菌斑减少量没有统计学上的显著差异。在第4周后,前瞻性比较发现,仅电动牙刷的牙菌斑有统计学上的显著减少(<0.05)。电动牙刷被参与者接受的程度显著更高(<0.01)。

与手动牙刷相比,电动牙刷能更好地清除牙菌斑,且更受儿童欢迎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验