Amerio Paolo, Giuliani Federica, Coppola Marco, Lobefaro Fabio, Gualdi Giulio
Deparment of Medicine and Aging Science, UOC Dermatologia University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 5;13(4):953. doi: 10.3390/life13040953.
Dermatologists had to face several challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this scenario, a large amount of data has been produced and published.
We present a literature analysis of publications on COVID-19 in the dermatology field in the first year of the pandemic.
The research was carried out by searching the PubMed database using keywords related to "COVID-19" combined with the keyword "Dermatology" in the "affiliation" search field and collecting articles published from February 2020 to December 2020.
A total of 816 publications from 57 countries were retrieved. Overall, publications increased notably along the timespan considered in this study and appeared to be closely linked to pandemic progression in different countries. In addition, article types (i.e., commentaries, case reports, original research) appeared to be strictly influenced by the pandemic's progression. However, the number and category of these publications may raise questions regarding the scientific relevance of the messages reported.
Our analysis provides a descriptive quantitative analysis and suggests that publications do not always respond to real scientific needs but are sometimes linked to a need/opportunity for publication.
在新冠疫情期间,皮肤科医生面临着诸多挑战。在这种情况下,产生并发表了大量数据。
我们对疫情第一年皮肤科领域关于新冠的出版物进行文献分析。
通过在PubMed数据库中,在“机构”搜索字段使用与“新冠”相关的关键词并结合“皮肤科”关键词进行检索,收集2020年2月至2020年12月发表的文章。
共检索到来自57个国家的816篇出版物。总体而言,在本研究考虑的时间段内,出版物数量显著增加,且似乎与不同国家的疫情进展密切相关。此外,文章类型(即评论、病例报告、原创研究)似乎受到疫情进展的严格影响。然而,这些出版物的数量和类别可能会引发关于所报道信息的科学相关性的问题。
我们的分析提供了一种描述性定量分析,并表明出版物并非总是满足实际科学需求,有时与发表需求/机会相关。