Department of Urology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang 10444, Republic of Korea.
Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 10;59(4):744. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040744.
: Ureteral stent insertion passively dilates the ureter. Therefore, it is sometimes used preoperatively before flexible ureterorenoscopy to make the ureter more accessible and facilitate urolithiasis passage, especially when ureteroscopic access has failed or when the ureter is expected to be tight. However, it may cause stent-related discomfort and complications. This study aimed to assess the effect of ureteral stenting prior to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). : Data from patients who underwent unilateral RIRS for renal stone with the use of a ureteral access sheath from January 2016 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, presence of hydronephrosis, and treated side, were recorded. Stone characteristics in terms of maximal stone length, modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score, and stone composition were evaluated. Surgical outcomes, including operative time, complication rate, and stone-free rate, were compared between two groups divided by whether preoperative stenting was performed. : Of the 260 patients enrolled in this study, 106 patients had no preoperative stenting (stentless group), and 154 patients had stenting (stenting group). Patient characteristics except for the presence of hydronephrosis and stone composition were not statistically different between the two groups. In surgical outcomes, the stone-free rate was not statistically different between the two groups ( = 0.901); however, the operation time for the stenting group was longer than that of the stentless group (44.8 ± 24.2 vs. 36.1 ± 17.6 min; = 0.001). There were no differences in the complication rate between the two groups ( = 0.523). : Among surgical outcomes for RIRS with a ureteral access sheath, preoperative ureteral stenting does not provide a significant advantage over non-stenting with respect to the stone-free rate and complication rate.
输尿管支架置入术通过被动扩张输尿管。因此,它有时被用于软性输尿管镜检查术之前,以增加输尿管的可接近性并促进尿路结石的通过,特别是在输尿管镜检查术失败或预计输尿管较紧时。然而,它可能会引起与支架相关的不适和并发症。本研究旨在评估输尿管支架置入术在逆行肾内手术(RIRS)前的效果。
回顾性分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 5 月期间因肾结石接受单侧 RIRS 并使用输尿管入路鞘的患者数据。记录患者特征,包括年龄、性别、BMI、是否存在肾积水和治疗侧。评估结石特征,包括最大结石长度、改良首尔国立大学肾结石复杂性评分和结石成分。比较两组患者的手术结果,包括手术时间、并发症发生率和结石清除率,两组患者的分组依据是是否进行术前支架置入术。
在这项研究中,260 名患者中,有 106 名患者未进行术前支架置入术(无支架组),有 154 名患者进行了支架置入术(支架组)。两组患者除了肾积水和结石成分外,其他患者特征无统计学差异。在手术结果方面,两组患者的结石清除率无统计学差异(=0.901);然而,支架组的手术时间长于无支架组(44.8±24.2 vs. 36.1±17.6 min;=0.001)。两组患者的并发症发生率无差异(=0.523)。
在使用输尿管入路鞘的 RIRS 手术中,与非支架置入相比,术前输尿管支架置入在结石清除率和并发症发生率方面并没有明显优势。