Alemneh Sendeku Takele, Babor Majharulislam, Zettel Viktoria, von Wrochem Almut, Hitzmann Bernd
Department of Process Analytics and Cereal Science, Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Microorganisms. 2023 Apr 15;11(4):1032. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11041032.
The demand for probiotic bacteria-fermented food products is increasing; however, the monitoring of the fermentation process is still challenging when using conventional approaches. A classical approach requires a large amount of offline data to calibrate a chemometric model using fluorescence spectra. Fluorescence spectra provide a wide range of online information during the process of cultivation, but they require a large amount of offline data (which involves laborious work) for the calibration procedure when using a classical approach. In this study, an alternative model-based calibration approach was used to predict biomass (the growth of A6 (LPA6) and GG (LCGG)), glucose, and lactic acid during the fermentation process of a teff-based substrate inoculated with mixed strains of LPA6 and LCGG. A classical approach was also applied and compared to the model-based calibration approach. In the model-based calibration approach, two-dimensional (2D) fluorescence spectra and offline substituted simulated data were used to generate a chemometric model. The optimum microbial specific growth rate and chemometric model parameters were obtained simultaneously using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. The prediction errors for biomass, glucose, and lactic acid concentrations were measured between 6.1 and 10.5%; the minimum error value was related to the prediction of biomass and the maximum one was related to the prediction of glucose using the model-based calibration approach. The model-based calibration approach and the classical approach showed similar results. In conclusion, the findings showed that a model-based calibration approach could be used to monitor the process state variables (i.e., biomass, glucose, and lactic acid) online in the fermentation process of a teff-based substrate inoculated with mixed strains of LPA6 and LCGG. However, glucose prediction showed a high error value.
对益生菌发酵食品的需求正在增加;然而,使用传统方法监测发酵过程仍然具有挑战性。经典方法需要大量离线数据来使用荧光光谱校准化学计量模型。荧光光谱在培养过程中提供了广泛的在线信息,但在使用经典方法进行校准时,它们需要大量离线数据(这涉及繁琐的工作)。在本研究中,使用了一种基于模型的替代校准方法来预测接种LPA6和LCGG混合菌株的基于画眉草的底物发酵过程中的生物量(A6(LPA6)和GG(LCGG)的生长)、葡萄糖和乳酸。还应用了经典方法并与基于模型的校准方法进行比较。在基于模型的校准方法中,使用二维(2D)荧光光谱和离线替代模拟数据生成化学计量模型。使用粒子群优化算法同时获得最佳微生物比生长速率和化学计量模型参数。生物量、葡萄糖和乳酸浓度的预测误差在6.1%至10.5%之间;最小误差值与生物量的预测有关,最大误差值与使用基于模型的校准方法预测葡萄糖有关。基于模型的校准方法和经典方法显示出相似的结果。总之,研究结果表明,基于模型的校准方法可用于在线监测接种LPA6和LCGG混合菌株的基于画眉草的底物发酵过程中的过程状态变量(即生物量、葡萄糖和乳酸)。然而,葡萄糖预测显示出较高的误差值。